Nuprl Lemma : rel_or_idempotent

∀[T:Type]. ∀[R:T ⟶ T ⟶ ℙ].  R ∨ R ⇐⇒ R


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  rel_equivalent: R1 ⇐⇒ R2,  rel_or: R1 ∨ R2,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  prop: ℙ,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  universe: Type
Definitions unfolded in proof :  rel_or: R1 ∨ R2,  rel_equivalent: R1 ⇐⇒ R2,  infix_ap: x f y,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  and: P ∧ Q,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  or: P ∨ Q,  member: t ∈ T,  prop: ℙ,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q
Lemmas referenced :  or_wf
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalRule,  sqequalReflexivity,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  isect_memberFormation,  lambdaFormation,  independent_pairFormation,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  unionElimination,  thin,  hypothesis,  cut,  lemma_by_obid,  isectElimination,  applyEquality,  hypothesisEquality,  inlFormation,  functionEquality,  cumulativity,  universeEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}[T:Type].  \mforall{}[R:T  {}\mrightarrow{}  T  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbP{}].    R  \mvee{}  R  \mLeftarrow{}{}\mRightarrow{}  R



Date html generated: 2016_05_14-PM-03_56_15
Last ObjectModification: 2015_12_26-PM-06_55_21

Theory : relations2


Home Index