Nuprl Lemma : new_23_sig_newvote_wf
∀[Cmd:ValueAllType]. (new_23_sig_newvote(Cmd) ∈ (ℤ × ℤ) ⟶ (ℤ × ℤ × Cmd × Id) ⟶ (Cmd List × (Id List)) ⟶ 𝔹)
Proof
Definitions occuring in Statement :
new_23_sig_newvote: new_23_sig_newvote(Cmd),
Id: Id,
list: T List,
vatype: ValueAllType,
bool: 𝔹,
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],
member: t ∈ T,
function: x:A ⟶ B[x],
product: x:A × B[x],
int: ℤ
Definitions unfolded in proof :
vatype: ValueAllType,
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],
member: t ∈ T,
new_23_sig_newvote: new_23_sig_newvote(Cmd),
subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,
deq: EqDecider(T)
Latex:
\mforall{}[Cmd:ValueAllType]
(new\_23\_sig\_newvote(Cmd) \mmember{} (\mBbbZ{} \mtimes{} \mBbbZ{}) {}\mrightarrow{} (\mBbbZ{} \mtimes{} \mBbbZ{} \mtimes{} Cmd \mtimes{} Id) {}\mrightarrow{} (Cmd List \mtimes{} (Id List)) {}\mrightarrow{} \mBbbB{})
Date html generated:
2016_05_17-PM-02_02_37
Last ObjectModification:
2015_12_29-PM-08_09_48
Theory : 2!3!consensus!with!signatures
Home
Index