Nuprl Lemma : basic-seq-1-3_wf
∀[s:SES]. ∀[pas:Id ⟶ Id ⟶ Atom1 ⟶ Atom1 ⟶ Atom1 ⟶ (ProtocolAction List)]. (A ⟶ B: pas[A;B;m;n;x] ∈ Basic1)
Proof
Definitions occuring in Statement :
basic-seq-1-3: A ⟶ B: pas[A; B; m; n; x],
ses-basic-sequence1: Basic1,
protocol-action: ProtocolAction,
security-event-structure: SES,
Id: Id,
list: T List,
atom: Atom$n,
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],
so_apply: x[s1;s2;s3;s4;s5],
member: t ∈ T,
function: x:A ⟶ B[x]
Definitions unfolded in proof :
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],
member: t ∈ T,
basic-seq-1-3: A ⟶ B: pas[A; B; m; n; x],
ses-basic-sequence1: Basic1,
so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],
so_apply: x[s1;s2;s3;s4;s5],
so_apply: x[s]
Latex:
\mforall{}[s:SES]. \mforall{}[pas:Id {}\mrightarrow{} Id {}\mrightarrow{} Atom1 {}\mrightarrow{} Atom1 {}\mrightarrow{} Atom1 {}\mrightarrow{} (ProtocolAction List)].
(A {}\mrightarrow{} B: pas[A;B;m;n;x] \mmember{} Basic1)
Date html generated:
2016_05_17-PM-00_41_48
Last ObjectModification:
2015_12_29-PM-06_31_16
Theory : event-logic-applications
Home
Index