Nuprl Lemma : ses-secrecy_wf
∀[s:SES]. ∀[agents:Id List]. ∀[secrets:Atom1 List]. ∀[es:EO+(Info)]. (Only agents in agents have atoms in secrets ∈ ℙ)
Proof
Definitions occuring in Statement :
ses-secrecy: Only agents in As have atoms in secrets,
ses-info: Info,
security-event-structure: SES,
event-ordering+: EO+(Info),
Id: Id,
list: T List,
atom: Atom$n,
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],
prop: ℙ,
member: t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],
member: t ∈ T,
ses-secrecy: Only agents in As have atoms in secrets,
subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,
so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],
implies: P ⇒ Q,
prop: ℙ,
all: ∀x:A. B[x],
so_apply: x[s]
Latex:
\mforall{}[s:SES]. \mforall{}[agents:Id List]. \mforall{}[secrets:Atom1 List]. \mforall{}[es:EO+(Info)].
(Only agents in agents have atoms in secrets \mmember{} \mBbbP{})
Date html generated:
2016_05_17-AM-11_48_44
Last ObjectModification:
2015_12_29-PM-06_39_39
Theory : event-logic-applications
Home
Index