Nuprl Lemma : fpf-disjoint-compatible

[A:Type]. ∀[eq:EqDecider(A)]. ∀[B:A ⟶ Type]. ∀[f,g:a:A fp-> B[a]].  || supposing l_disjoint(A;fst(f);fst(g))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  fpf-compatible: || g fpf: a:A fp-> B[a] l_disjoint: l_disjoint(T;l1;l2) deq: EqDecider(T) uimplies: supposing a uall: [x:A]. B[x] so_apply: x[s] pi1: fst(t) function: x:A ⟶ B[x] universe: Type
Definitions unfolded in proof :  fpf-compatible: || g fpf: a:A fp-> B[a] fpf-ap: f(x) fpf-dom: x ∈ dom(f) uall: [x:A]. B[x] member: t ∈ T uimplies: supposing a all: x:A. B[x] implies:  Q and: P ∧ Q pi1: fst(t) pi2: snd(t) prop: so_apply: x[s] iff: ⇐⇒ Q l_disjoint: l_disjoint(T;l1;l2) not: ¬A cand: c∧ B false: False

Latex:
\mforall{}[A:Type].  \mforall{}[eq:EqDecider(A)].  \mforall{}[B:A  {}\mrightarrow{}  Type].  \mforall{}[f,g:a:A  fp->  B[a]].
    f  ||  g  supposing  l\_disjoint(A;fst(f);fst(g))



Date html generated: 2016_05_16-AM-11_28_40
Last ObjectModification: 2015_12_29-AM-09_25_05

Theory : event-ordering


Home Index