Nuprl Lemma : three-consensus-ts_wf

[V:Type]. ∀[A:Id List]. ∀[t:ℕ]. ∀[f:(V List) ⟶ V].  (three-consensus-ts(V;A;t;f) ∈ transition-system{i:l})


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  three-consensus-ts: three-consensus-ts(V;A;t;f) Id: Id list: List nat: uall: [x:A]. B[x] member: t ∈ T function: x:A ⟶ B[x] universe: Type transition-system: transition-system{i:l}
Definitions unfolded in proof :  three-consensus-ts: three-consensus-ts(V;A;t;f) transition-system: transition-system{i:l} uall: [x:A]. B[x] member: t ∈ T prop: all: x:A. B[x] so_lambda: λ2x.t[x] and: P ∧ Q implies:  Q nat: so_apply: x[s] exists: x:A. B[x] subtype_rel: A ⊆B uimplies: supposing a top: Top infix_ap: y

Latex:
\mforall{}[V:Type].  \mforall{}[A:Id  List].  \mforall{}[t:\mBbbN{}].  \mforall{}[f:(V  List)  {}\mrightarrow{}  V].
    (three-consensus-ts(V;A;t;f)  \mmember{}  transition-system\{i:l\})



Date html generated: 2016_05_16-PM-00_44_16
Last ObjectModification: 2015_12_29-PM-01_36_51

Theory : event-ordering


Home Index