Nuprl Lemma : virus-process_wf
∀[M,E:Type ⟶ Type]. ∀[g:⋂T:Type. (T ⟶ E[T])]. (virus-process(g) ∈ process(P.M[P];P.E[P]))
Proof
Definitions occuring in Statement :
virus-process: virus-process(g),
process: process(P.M[P];P.E[P]),
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],
so_apply: x[s],
member: t ∈ T,
isect: ⋂x:A. B[x],
function: x:A ⟶ B[x],
universe: Type
Definitions unfolded in proof :
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],
member: t ∈ T,
virus-process: virus-process(g),
process: process(P.M[P];P.E[P]),
so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],
so_apply: x[s],
subtype_rel: A ⊆r B
Latex:
\mforall{}[M,E:Type {}\mrightarrow{} Type]. \mforall{}[g:\mcap{}T:Type. (T {}\mrightarrow{} E[T])]. (virus-process(g) \mmember{} process(P.M[P];P.E[P]))
Date html generated:
2016_05_16-AM-11_44_52
Last ObjectModification:
2015_12_29-PM-01_14_31
Theory : event-ordering
Home
Index