Nuprl Lemma : bind-class-program-eq-hdf

[Info,A,B:Type].
  ∀[xpr1,xpr2:Id ⟶ hdataflow(Info;A)]. ∀[ypr1,ypr2:A ⟶ Id ⟶ hdataflow(Info;B)].
    (xpr1 >>ypr1 xpr2 >>ypr2 ∈ (Id ⟶ hdataflow(Info;B))) supposing 
       ((xpr1 xpr2 ∈ (Id ⟶ hdataflow(Info;A))) and 
       (ypr1 ypr2 ∈ (A ⟶ Id ⟶ hdataflow(Info;B)))) 
  supposing valueall-type(B)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  bind-class-program: xpr >>ypr hdataflow: hdataflow(A;B) Id: Id valueall-type: valueall-type(T) uimplies: supposing a uall: [x:A]. B[x] function: x:A ⟶ B[x] universe: Type equal: t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: [x:A]. B[x] member: t ∈ T uimplies: supposing a bind-class-program: xpr >>ypr squash: T prop:

Latex:
\mforall{}[Info,A,B:Type].
    \mforall{}[xpr1,xpr2:Id  {}\mrightarrow{}  hdataflow(Info;A)].  \mforall{}[ypr1,ypr2:A  {}\mrightarrow{}  Id  {}\mrightarrow{}  hdataflow(Info;B)].
        (xpr1  >>=  ypr1  =  xpr2  >>=  ypr2)  supposing  ((xpr1  =  xpr2)  and  (ypr1  =  ypr2)) 
    supposing  valueall-type(B)



Date html generated: 2016_05_17-AM-09_06_56
Last ObjectModification: 2016_01_17-PM-09_14_00

Theory : local!classes


Home Index