Nuprl Lemma : parallel-class-program-compose2-eq
∀[A,B,C:Type]. ∀[X1,X2:Id ⟶ hdataflow(A;B ⟶ bag(C))]. ∀[X:Id ⟶ hdataflow(A;B)].
(X1 o X || X2 o X = X1 || X2 o X ∈ (Id ⟶ hdataflow(A;C))) supposing (valueall-type(C) and valueall-type(B) and (↓B))
Proof
Definitions occuring in Statement :
parallel-class-program: X || Y,
eclass2-program: Xpr o Ypr,
hdataflow: hdataflow(A;B),
Id: Id,
valueall-type: valueall-type(T),
uimplies: b supposing a,
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],
squash: ↓T,
function: x:A ⟶ B[x],
universe: Type,
equal: s = t ∈ T,
bag: bag(T)
Latex:
\mforall{}[A,B,C:Type]. \mforall{}[X1,X2:Id {}\mrightarrow{} hdataflow(A;B {}\mrightarrow{} bag(C))]. \mforall{}[X:Id {}\mrightarrow{} hdataflow(A;B)].
(X1 o X || X2 o X = X1 || X2 o X) supposing (valueall-type(C) and valueall-type(B) and (\mdownarrow{}B))
Date html generated:
2016_05_17-AM-09_08_49
Last ObjectModification:
2015_12_29-PM-03_35_26
Theory : local!classes
Home
Index