Nuprl Lemma : failure-known-effective

[es:EO]. ∀[i:Id]. ∀[e:E].  uiff(failure-known(es;e;i);∀x@i.e c≤  es-effective(es;x)))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  es-effective: es-effective(es;e) failure-known: failure-known(es;e;i) es-causle: c≤ e' alle-at: e@i.P[e] es-E: E event_ordering: EO Id: Id uiff: uiff(P;Q) uall: [x:A]. B[x] not: ¬A implies:  Q
Definitions unfolded in proof :  es-effective: es-effective(es;e) alle-at: e@i.P[e] failure-known: failure-known(es;e;i) uall: [x:A]. B[x] member: t ∈ T uiff: uiff(P;Q) and: P ∧ Q uimplies: supposing a all: x:A. B[x] implies:  Q not: ¬A false: False prop: so_lambda: λ2x.t[x] so_apply: x[s] exists: x:A. B[x] squash: T true: True subtype_rel: A ⊆B guard: {T} iff: ⇐⇒ Q rev_implies:  Q

Latex:
\mforall{}[es:EO].  \mforall{}[i:Id].  \mforall{}[e:E].    uiff(failure-known(es;e;i);\mforall{}x@i.e  c\mleq{}  x  {}\mRightarrow{}  (\mneg{}es-effective(es;x)))



Date html generated: 2016_05_16-AM-10_22_14
Last ObjectModification: 2016_01_17-PM-01_21_09

Theory : new!event-ordering


Home Index