Nuprl Lemma : weak-antecedent-functions-compose

es:EO
  ∀[P,Q,R:E ⟶ ℙ].
    ∀f:{e:E| e}  ⟶ {e:E| e} . ∀g:{e:E| e}  ⟶ {e:E| e} .  ((Q ←==f== P ∧ R ←==g== Q)  R ←==g f== P)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  weak-antecedent-function: Q ←==f== P es-E: E event_ordering: EO compose: g uall: [x:A]. B[x] prop: all: x:A. B[x] implies:  Q and: P ∧ Q set: {x:A| B[x]}  apply: a function: x:A ⟶ B[x]
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: x:A. B[x] uall: [x:A]. B[x] implies:  Q and: P ∧ Q weak-antecedent-function: Q ←==f== P member: t ∈ T prop: so_lambda: λ2x.t[x] subtype_rel: A ⊆B so_apply: x[s] uimplies: supposing a compose: g cand: c∧ B guard: {T}

Latex:
\mforall{}es:EO
    \mforall{}[P,Q,R:E  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbP{}].
        \mforall{}f:\{e:E|  P  e\}    {}\mrightarrow{}  \{e:E|  Q  e\}  .  \mforall{}g:\{e:E|  Q  e\}    {}\mrightarrow{}  \{e:E|  R  e\}  .
            ((Q  \mleftarrow{}==f==  P  \mwedge{}  R  \mleftarrow{}==g==  Q)  {}\mRightarrow{}  R  \mleftarrow{}==g  o  f==  P)



Date html generated: 2016_05_16-AM-10_16_18
Last ObjectModification: 2015_12_28-PM-09_23_25

Theory : new!event-ordering


Home Index