Nuprl Lemma : lg-all-wf_dag
∀[T:Type]. ∀[P:T ⟶ ℙ]. ∀[G:LabeledDAG(T)]. (∀x∈G.P[x] ∈ ℙ)
Proof
Definitions occuring in Statement :
lg-all: ∀x∈G.P[x],
ldag: LabeledDAG(T),
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],
prop: ℙ,
so_apply: x[s],
member: t ∈ T,
function: x:A ⟶ B[x],
universe: Type
Definitions unfolded in proof :
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],
member: t ∈ T,
so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],
so_apply: x[s],
ldag: LabeledDAG(T),
prop: ℙ
Latex:
\mforall{}[T:Type]. \mforall{}[P:T {}\mrightarrow{} \mBbbP{}]. \mforall{}[G:LabeledDAG(T)]. (\mforall{}x\mmember{}G.P[x] \mmember{} \mBbbP{})
Date html generated:
2016_05_17-AM-10_18_04
Last ObjectModification:
2015_12_29-PM-05_31_03
Theory : process-model
Home
Index