Nuprl Lemma : run-event-interval-cases

∀[M:Type ⟶ Type]
  ∀S0:System(P.M[P]). ∀r:fulpRunType(P.M[P]). ∀e1,e2:runEvents(r).
    (((run-prior-state(S0;r;e2) = run-prior-state(S0;r;e1) ∈ (Process(P.M[P]) List))
       ∧ (run-event-interval(r;e1;e2) = [e2] ∈ (runEvents(r) List)))
       ∨ (∃e:runEvents(r)
           (run-event-step(e) < run-event-step(e2)
           ∧ (run-event-step(e1) ≤ run-event-step(e))
           ∧ ((run-event-loc(e1) = run-event-loc(e) ∈ Id)
             ∧ (run-prior-state(S0;r;e2) = run-event-state(r;e) ∈ (Process(P.M[P]) List)))
           ∧ (run-event-interval(r;e1;e2) = (run-event-interval(r;e1;e) @ [e2]) ∈ (runEvents(r) List))))) supposing 
       ((run-event-step(e1) ≤ run-event-step(e2)) and 
       (run-event-loc(e1) = run-event-loc(e2) ∈ Id))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  run-prior-state: run-prior-state(S0;r;e),  run-event-interval: run-event-interval(r;e1;e2),  run-event-step: run-event-step(e),  run-event-loc: run-event-loc(e),  run-event-state: run-event-state(r;e),  runEvents: runEvents(r),  fulpRunType: fulpRunType(T.M[T]),  System: System(P.M[P]),  Process: Process(P.M[P]),  Id: Id,  append: as @ bs,  cons: [a / b],  nil: [],  list: T List,  less_than: a < b,  uimplies: b supposing a,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  so_apply: x[s],  le: A ≤ B,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  or: P ∨ Q,  and: P ∧ Q,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  universe: Type,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  uimplies: b supposing a,  le: A ≤ B,  and: P ∧ Q,  not: ¬A,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  false: False,  nat: ℕ,  prop: ℙ,  or: P ∨ Q,  runEvents: runEvents(r),  guard: {T},  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  cand: A c∧ B,  run-prior-state: run-prior-state(S0;r;e),  Id: Id,  sq_type: SQType(T),  System: System(P.M[P]),  mapfilter: mapfilter(f;P;L),  pi1: fst(t),  component: component(P.M[P]),  pi2: snd(t),  top: Top

Latex:
\mforall{}[M:Type  {}\mrightarrow{}  Type]
    \mforall{}S0:System(P.M[P]).  \mforall{}r:fulpRunType(P.M[P]).  \mforall{}e1,e2:runEvents(r).
        (((run-prior-state(S0;r;e2)  =  run-prior-state(S0;r;e1))  \mwedge{}  (run-event-interval(r;e1;e2)  =  [e2]))
              \mvee{}  (\mexists{}e:runEvents(r)
                      (run-event-step(e)  <  run-event-step(e2)
                      \mwedge{}  (run-event-step(e1)  \mleq{}  run-event-step(e))
                      \mwedge{}  ((run-event-loc(e1)  =  run-event-loc(e))
                          \mwedge{}  (run-prior-state(S0;r;e2)  =  run-event-state(r;e)))
                      \mwedge{}  (run-event-interval(r;e1;e2)  =  (run-event-interval(r;e1;e)  @  [e2])))))  supposing 
              ((run-event-step(e1)  \mleq{}  run-event-step(e2))  and 
              (run-event-loc(e1)  =  run-event-loc(e2)))



Date html generated: 2016_05_17-AM-10_45_30
Last ObjectModification: 2015_12_29-PM-05_22_41

Theory : process-model


Home Index