Nuprl Lemma : run-system_wf

[M:Type ⟶ Type]. ∀[r:fulpRunType(P.M[P])]. ∀[t:ℕ+].  (run-system(r;t) ∈ System(P.M[P]))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  run-system: run-system(r;t) fulpRunType: fulpRunType(T.M[T]) System: System(P.M[P]) nat_plus: + uall: [x:A]. B[x] so_apply: x[s] member: t ∈ T function: x:A ⟶ B[x] universe: Type
Definitions unfolded in proof :  fulpRunType: fulpRunType(T.M[T]) uall: [x:A]. B[x] member: t ∈ T run-system: run-system(r;t) nat: nat_plus: + all: x:A. B[x] decidable: Dec(P) or: P ∨ Q uimplies: supposing a satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla) exists: x:A. B[x] false: False implies:  Q not: ¬A top: Top and: P ∧ Q prop: so_lambda: λ2x.t[x] so_apply: x[s]

Latex:
\mforall{}[M:Type  {}\mrightarrow{}  Type].  \mforall{}[r:fulpRunType(P.M[P])].  \mforall{}[t:\mBbbN{}\msupplus{}].    (run-system(r;t)  \mmember{}  System(P.M[P]))



Date html generated: 2016_05_17-AM-10_41_27
Last ObjectModification: 2016_01_18-AM-00_14_32

Theory : process-model


Home Index