Nuprl Lemma : W-induction1
∀[A:Type]. ∀[B:A ⟶ Type]. ∀[Q:W(A;a.B[a]) ⟶ ℙ].
((∀a:A. ∀f:B[a] ⟶ W(A;a.B[a]). ((∀b:B[a]. Q[f b]) ⇒ Q[Wsup(a;f)])) ⇒ (∀w:W(A;a.B[a]). Q[w]))
Proof
Definitions occuring in Statement :
Wsup: Wsup(a;b),
W: W(A;a.B[a]),
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],
prop: ℙ,
so_apply: x[s],
all: ∀x:A. B[x],
implies: P ⇒ Q,
apply: f a,
function: x:A ⟶ B[x],
universe: Type
Definitions unfolded in proof :
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],
implies: P ⇒ Q,
all: ∀x:A. B[x],
member: t ∈ T,
so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],
so_apply: x[s],
so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],
so_apply: x[s1;s2],
so_lambda: so_lambda(x,y,z.t[x; y; z]),
so_apply: x[s1;s2;s3],
subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,
W: W(A;a.B[a]),
uimplies: b supposing a,
unit: Unit,
prop: ℙ,
pW-sup: pW-sup(a;f),
Wsup: Wsup(a;b),
guard: {T}
Lemmas referenced :
param-W-induction,
unit_wf2,
it_wf,
subtype_rel-equal,
param-W_wf,
equal-unit,
all_wf,
W_wf,
Wsup_wf
Rules used in proof :
sqequalSubstitution,
sqequalTransitivity,
computationStep,
sqequalReflexivity,
isect_memberFormation,
lambdaFormation,
cut,
lemma_by_obid,
sqequalHypSubstitution,
isectElimination,
thin,
hypothesis,
sqequalRule,
lambdaEquality,
hypothesisEquality,
applyEquality,
dependent_functionElimination,
independent_isectElimination,
because_Cache,
independent_functionElimination,
equalityElimination,
functionEquality,
cumulativity,
universeEquality
Latex:
\mforall{}[A:Type]. \mforall{}[B:A {}\mrightarrow{} Type]. \mforall{}[Q:W(A;a.B[a]) {}\mrightarrow{} \mBbbP{}].
((\mforall{}a:A. \mforall{}f:B[a] {}\mrightarrow{} W(A;a.B[a]). ((\mforall{}b:B[a]. Q[f b]) {}\mRightarrow{} Q[Wsup(a;f)])) {}\mRightarrow{} (\mforall{}w:W(A;a.B[a]). Q[w]))
Date html generated:
2016_05_14-AM-06_15_31
Last ObjectModification:
2015_12_26-PM-00_04_55
Theory : co-recursion
Home
Index