Nuprl Lemma : not_functionality_wrt_uiff

[P,Q:ℙ].  ({uiff(P;Q)}  {uiff(¬P;¬Q)})


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  uiff: uiff(P;Q) uall: [x:A]. B[x] prop: guard: {T} not: ¬A implies:  Q
Definitions unfolded in proof :  guard: {T} not: ¬A uall: [x:A]. B[x] member: t ∈ T implies:  Q uiff: uiff(P;Q) and: P ∧ Q uimplies: supposing a false: False prop:
Lemmas referenced :  false_wf uiff_wf
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution sqequalRule sqequalReflexivity sqequalTransitivity computationStep Error :isect_memberFormation_alt,  introduction cut lambdaFormation sqequalHypSubstitution productElimination thin independent_pairFormation independent_isectElimination hypothesis independent_functionElimination voidElimination hypothesisEquality lambdaEquality dependent_functionElimination Error :functionIsType,  Error :universeIsType,  extract_by_obid because_Cache isectElimination independent_pairEquality isect_memberEquality functionEquality equalityTransitivity equalitySymmetry Error :inhabitedIsType,  universeEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}[P,Q:\mBbbP{}].    (\{uiff(P;Q)\}  {}\mRightarrow{}  \{uiff(\mneg{}P;\mneg{}Q)\})



Date html generated: 2019_06_20-AM-11_14_19
Last ObjectModification: 2018_09_26-AM-10_41_51

Theory : core_2


Home Index