Nuprl Lemma : Riemann-integral-same-endpoints

[a:ℝ]. ∀[f:{f:[a, a] ⟶ℝifun(f;[a, a])} ].  (∫ f[x] dx on [a, a] r0)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  Riemann-integral: ∫ f[x] dx on [a, b] ifun: ifun(f;I) rfun: I ⟶ℝ rccint: [l, u] req: y int-to-real: r(n) real: uall: [x:A]. B[x] so_apply: x[s] set: {x:A| B[x]}  natural_number: $n
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: [x:A]. B[x] member: t ∈ T uimplies: supposing a prop: so_lambda: λ2x.t[x] label: ...$L... t rfun: I ⟶ℝ so_apply: x[s] ifun: ifun(f;I) all: x:A. B[x] top: Top real-fun: real-fun(f;a;b) implies:  Q uiff: uiff(P;Q) and: P ∧ Q rev_uimplies: rev_uimplies(P;Q) iff: ⇐⇒ Q
Lemmas referenced :  req_witness Riemann-integral_wf rleq_weakening_equal rleq_wf i-member_wf rccint_wf real_wf left_endpoint_rccint_lemma right_endpoint_rccint_lemma req_functionality req_weakening req_wf set_wf ifun_wf rccint-icompact int-to-real_wf rfun_wf Riemann-integral-single
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution sqequalTransitivity computationStep sqequalReflexivity isect_memberFormation introduction cut extract_by_obid sqequalHypSubstitution isectElimination thin hypothesisEquality because_Cache independent_isectElimination hypothesis dependent_set_memberEquality sqequalRule setElimination rename lambdaEquality applyEquality setEquality dependent_functionElimination isect_memberEquality voidElimination voidEquality lambdaFormation independent_functionElimination productElimination natural_numberEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}[a:\mBbbR{}].  \mforall{}[f:\{f:[a,  a]  {}\mrightarrow{}\mBbbR{}|  ifun(f;[a,  a])\}  ].    (\mint{}  f[x]  dx  on  [a,  a]  =  r0)



Date html generated: 2016_10_26-PM-00_03_26
Last ObjectModification: 2016_09_12-PM-05_38_18

Theory : reals_2


Home Index