Nuprl - Proof: all intseg vs iter and 1

(12steps total) PrintForm Definitions Lemmas IteratedBinops Sections DiscrMathExt Doc

IF YOU CAN SEE THIS go to /sfa/Nuprl/Shared/Xindentation_hack_doc.html
At: all intseg vs iter and 1

1. a :

b:

, P:({a..b

}

Prop). (

i:{a..b

}. P(i))

(And i:{a..b

}. P(i))

By:	b:, P:({a..b}Prop). ba ((i:{a..b}. P(i)) (And i:{a..b}. P(i))) \| k:, b:. b-a = k (P:({a..b}Prop). (i:{a..b}. P(i)) (And i:{a..b}. P(i))) Asserted

Generated subgoals:

1   b:, P:({a..b}Prop). ba  ((i:{a..b}. P(i))  (And i:{a..b}. P(i)))
2 steps

2 2. b:, P:({a..b}Prop). ba  ((i:{a..b}. P(i))  (And i:{a..b}. P(i)))
  k:, b:.
  b-a = k  (P:({a..b}Prop). (i:{a..b}. P(i))  (And i:{a..b}. P(i)))
4 steps

3 2. b:, P:({a..b}Prop). ba  ((i:{a..b}. P(i))  (And i:{a..b}. P(i)))
3. k:, b:.
3. b-a = k  (P:({a..b}Prop). (i:{a..b}. P(i))  (And i:{a..b}. P(i)))
  b:, P:({a..b}Prop). (i:{a..b}. P(i))  (And i:{a..b}. P(i))
4 steps

About:

IF YOU CAN SEE THIS go to /sfa/Nuprl/Shared/Xindentation_hack_doc.html

(12steps total) PrintForm Definitions Lemmas IteratedBinops Sections DiscrMathExt Doc