Nuprl Lemma : uorder_functionality_wrt_iff
∀[T:Type]. ∀[R,R':T ⟶ T ⟶ ℙ].
((∀[x,y:T]. (R[x;y] ⇐⇒ R'[x;y])) ⇒ (UniformOrder(T;x,y.R[x;y]) ⇐⇒ UniformOrder(T;x,y.R'[x;y])))
Proof
Definitions occuring in Statement :
uorder: UniformOrder(T;x,y.R[x; y]),
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],
prop: ℙ,
so_apply: x[s1;s2],
iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,
implies: P ⇒ Q,
function: x:A ⟶ B[x],
universe: Type
Definitions unfolded in proof :
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],
implies: P ⇒ Q,
iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,
and: P ∧ Q,
uorder: UniformOrder(T;x,y.R[x; y]),
member: t ∈ T,
prop: ℙ,
so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],
so_apply: x[s1;s2],
rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,
so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],
so_apply: x[s],
uimplies: b supposing a
Lemmas referenced :
uorder_wf,
uall_wf,
iff_wf,
urefl_functionality_wrt_iff,
utrans_functionality_wrt_iff,
iff_weakening_uiff,
uanti_sym_wf,
uanti_sym_functionality_wrt_iff
Rules used in proof :
sqequalSubstitution,
sqequalTransitivity,
computationStep,
sqequalReflexivity,
Error :isect_memberFormation_alt,
lambdaFormation,
independent_pairFormation,
sqequalHypSubstitution,
cut,
introduction,
extract_by_obid,
isectElimination,
thin,
hypothesisEquality,
sqequalRule,
lambdaEquality,
applyEquality,
hypothesis,
Error :inhabitedIsType,
Error :functionIsType,
Error :universeIsType,
universeEquality,
productElimination,
independent_functionElimination,
promote_hyp,
because_Cache,
independent_isectElimination
Latex:
\mforall{}[T:Type]. \mforall{}[R,R':T {}\mrightarrow{} T {}\mrightarrow{} \mBbbP{}].
((\mforall{}[x,y:T]. (R[x;y] \mLeftarrow{}{}\mRightarrow{} R'[x;y]))
{}\mRightarrow{} (UniformOrder(T;x,y.R[x;y]) \mLeftarrow{}{}\mRightarrow{} UniformOrder(T;x,y.R'[x;y])))
Date html generated:
2019_06_20-PM-00_29_32
Last ObjectModification:
2018_09_26-AM-11_53_45
Theory : rel_1
Home
Index