Nuprl Lemma : weak-antecedent-surjections-compose

es:EO
  ∀[P,Q,R:E ─→ ℙ].
    ∀f:{e:E| e}  ─→ {e:E| e} . ∀g:{e:E| e}  ─→ {e:E| e} .  ((Q ←←f== P ∧ R ←←g== Q)  R ←←f== P)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  weak-antecedent-surjection: Q ←←f== P es-E: E event_ordering: EO compose: g uall: [x:A]. B[x] prop: all: x:A. B[x] implies:  Q and: P ∧ Q set: {x:A| B[x]}  apply: a function: x:A ─→ B[x]
Lemmas :  weak-antecedent-functions-compose set_wf es-E_wf equal_wf compose_wf and_wf member_wf
\mforall{}es:EO
    \mforall{}[P,Q,R:E  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbP{}].
        \mforall{}f:\{e:E|  P  e\}    {}\mrightarrow{}  \{e:E|  Q  e\}  .  \mforall{}g:\{e:E|  Q  e\}    {}\mrightarrow{}  \{e:E|  R  e\}  .
            ((Q  \mleftarrow{}\mleftarrow{}=  f==  P  \mwedge{}  R  \mleftarrow{}\mleftarrow{}=  g==  Q)  {}\mRightarrow{}  R  \mleftarrow{}\mleftarrow{}=  g  o  f==  P)



Date html generated: 2015_07_17-AM-09_02_34
Last ObjectModification: 2015_01_27-PM-00_54_27

Home Index