Nuprl Lemma : set-induction

∀[P:Set{i:l} ⟶ ℙ']. ((∀T:Type. ∀f:T ⟶ Set{i:l}.  ((∀t:T. P[f[t]]) ⇒ P[f"(T)])) ⇒ (∀s:Set{i:l}. P[s]))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  mk-set: f"(T),  Set: Set{i:l},  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  prop: ℙ,  so_apply: x[s],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  universe: Type
Definitions unfolded in proof :  member: t ∈ T
Lemmas referenced :  Set-ind_wf
Rules used in proof :  introduction,  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  cut,  extract_by_obid,  hypothesis

Latex:
\mforall{}[P:Set\{i:l\}  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbP{}']
    ((\mforall{}T:Type.  \mforall{}f:T  {}\mrightarrow{}  Set\{i:l\}.    ((\mforall{}t:T.  P[f[t]])  {}\mRightarrow{}  P[f"(T)]))  {}\mRightarrow{}  (\mforall{}s:Set\{i:l\}.  P[s]))



Date html generated: 2018_05_22-PM-09_47_57
Last ObjectModification: 2018_05_16-PM-03_24_24

Theory : constructive!set!theory


Home Index