Nuprl Lemma : sym_grp_is_swaps_a

∀n:{1...}. ∀p:Sym(n).
  ∃abs:{ab:ℕn × ℕn| fst(ab) < snd(ab)}  List. (p = (Π map(λab.let a,b = ab in txpose_perm(a;b);abs)) ∈ Sym(n))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  mon_reduce: mon_reduce,  txpose_perm: txpose_perm,  sym_grp: Sym(n),  perm_igrp: perm_igrp(T),  map: map(f;as),  list: T List,  int_upper: {i...},  int_seg: {i..j-},  less_than: a < b,  pi1: fst(t),  pi2: snd(t),  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  set: {x:A| B[x]} ,  lambda: λx.A[x],  spread: spread def,  product: x:A × B[x],  natural_number: $n,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  sym_grp: Sym(n),  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  int_upper: {i...},  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  uimplies: b supposing a,  le: A ≤ B,  and: P ∧ Q,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  false: False,  not: ¬A,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  prop: ℙ,  pi1: fst(t),  int_seg: {i..j-},  pi2: snd(t),  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  igrp: IGroup,  imon: IMonoid,  perm_igrp: perm_igrp(T),  mk_igrp: mk_igrp(T;op;id;inv),  grp_car: |g|,  perm: Perm(T),  so_apply: x[s],  top: Top,  mon_reduce: mon_reduce,  grp_id: e,  infix_ap: x f y,  grp_op: *,  gt: i > j,  guard: {T},  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  squash: ↓T,  true: True,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  istype: istype(T)
Lemmas referenced :  perm_wf,  int_seg_wf,  int_upper_wf,  sym_grp_is_swaps,  upper_subtype_nat,  istype-false,  exists_wf,  list_wf,  less_than_wf,  equal_wf,  mon_reduce_wf,  perm_igrp_wf,  map_wf,  grp_car_wf,  txpose_perm_wf,  subtype_rel_self,  list_induction,  map_nil_lemma,  istype-void,  reduce_nil_lemma,  map_cons_lemma,  reduce_cons_lemma,  list_subtype_base,  product_subtype_base,  set_subtype_base,  lelt_wf,  istype-int,  int_subtype_base,  le_wf,  nil_wf,  id_perm_wf,  int_seg_properties,  int_upper_properties,  decidable__or,  or_wf,  equal-wf-base,  decidable__lt,  decidable__equal_int,  full-omega-unsat,  intformnot_wf,  intformor_wf,  intformless_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformeq_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_or_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  cons_wf,  pi1_wf,  subtype_rel_product,  pi2_wf,  comp_perm_wf,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  istype-universe,  txpose_perm_id,  iff_weakening_equal,  perm_ident,  txpose_perm_sym
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  lambdaFormation_alt,  universeIsType,  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  dependent_functionElimination,  thin,  isectElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  hypothesisEquality,  hypothesis,  applyEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  sqequalRule,  independent_pairFormation,  productElimination,  hyp_replacement,  equalitySymmetry,  applyLambdaEquality,  setEquality,  productEquality,  because_Cache,  lambdaEquality_alt,  inhabitedIsType,  equalityTransitivity,  productIsType,  setIsType,  independent_functionElimination,  isect_memberEquality_alt,  voidElimination,  equalityIsType4,  baseApply,  closedConclusion,  baseClosed,  intEquality,  dependent_pairFormation_alt,  unionElimination,  approximateComputation,  int_eqEquality,  dependent_set_memberEquality_alt,  independent_pairEquality,  imageElimination,  universeEquality,  imageMemberEquality,  instantiate

Latex:
\mforall{}n:\{1...\}.  \mforall{}p:Sym(n).
    \mexists{}abs:\{ab:\mBbbN{}n  \mtimes{}  \mBbbN{}n|  fst(ab)  <  snd(ab)\}    List.  (p  =  (\mPi{}  map(\mlambda{}ab.let  a,b  =  ab  in  txpose\_perm(a;b);abs))\000C)



Date html generated: 2019_10_16-PM-01_02_01
Last ObjectModification: 2018_10_08-PM-05_41_03

Theory : list_2


Home Index