Nuprl Lemma : AF-path-barred

∀[T:Type]. ∀[R:T ⟶ T ⟶ ℙ].
  (AFx,y:T.R[x;y] ⇒ (∀alpha:{f:ℕ ⟶ (T?)| ∀x:ℕ. (AF-spread-law(x,y.R[x;y]) x f (f x))} . (↓∃m:ℕ. (AFbar() m alpha))))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  AFbar: AFbar(),  AF-spread-law: AF-spread-law(x,y.R[x; y]),  almost-full: AFx,y:T.R[x; y],  nat: ℕ,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  prop: ℙ,  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  squash: ↓T,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  unit: Unit,  set: {x:A| B[x]} ,  apply: f a,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  union: left + right,  universe: Type
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  AFbar: AFbar(),  nat: ℕ,  le: A ≤ B,  and: P ∧ Q,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  false: False,  not: ¬A,  prop: ℙ,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  cand: A c∧ B,  less_than: a < b,  squash: ↓T,  true: True,  subtract: n - m,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  uimplies: b supposing a,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  top: Top,  AF-spread-law: AF-spread-law(x,y.R[x; y]),  almost-full: AFx,y:T.R[x; y],  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],  int_seg: {i..j-},  assert: ↑b,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  isl: isl(x),  btrue: tt,  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  outl: outl(x),  sq_type: SQType(T),  guard: {T},  bfalse: ff,  sq_stable: SqStable(P)
Lemmas referenced :  AF-spread-law_wf,  decidable__assert,  isr_wf,  unit_wf2,  nat_wf,  false_wf,  le_wf,  less_than_wf,  assert_wf,  subtract_wf,  decidable__le,  not-le-2,  less-iff-le,  condition-implies-le,  minus-one-mul,  zero-add,  minus-one-mul-top,  minus-add,  minus-minus,  add-associates,  add-swap,  add-commutes,  add_functionality_wrt_le,  add-zero,  le-add-cancel,  outl_wf,  not-isr-assert-isl,  equal_wf,  set_wf,  all_wf,  subtype_rel_function,  int_seg_wf,  int_seg_subtype_nat,  subtype_rel_self,  almost-full_wf,  decidable__exists_int_seg,  decidable__and2,  decidable__lt,  isl_wf,  not-isl-assert-isr,  and_wf,  subtype_base_sq,  int_subtype_base,  sq_stable__le,  not-lt-2,  add-mul-special,  zero-mul,  le-add-cancel2
Rules used in proof :  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  hypothesis,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  hypothesisEquality,  lambdaFormation,  setElimination,  rename,  sqequalRule,  dependent_functionElimination,  cumulativity,  applyEquality,  functionExtensionality,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  natural_numberEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  unionElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  because_Cache,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  productEquality,  voidElimination,  productElimination,  independent_functionElimination,  independent_isectElimination,  addEquality,  lambdaEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  voidEquality,  minusEquality,  intEquality,  promote_hyp,  unionEquality,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  imageElimination,  functionEquality,  universeEquality,  instantiate,  hyp_replacement,  applyLambdaEquality,  addLevel,  levelHypothesis,  inlEquality,  multiplyEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}[T:Type].  \mforall{}[R:T  {}\mrightarrow{}  T  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbP{}].
    (AFx,y:T.R[x;y]
    {}\mRightarrow{}  (\mforall{}alpha:\{f:\mBbbN{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  (T?)|  \mforall{}x:\mBbbN{}.  (AF-spread-law(x,y.R[x;y])  x  f  (f  x))\} 
                (\mdownarrow{}\mexists{}m:\mBbbN{}.  (AFbar()  m  alpha))))



Date html generated: 2019_06_20-AM-11_29_23
Last ObjectModification: 2018_08_21-PM-01_52_50

Theory : bar-induction


Home Index