Nuprl Lemma : strat2play-invariant

∀g:SimpleGame. ∀n:ℕ. ∀s:win2strat(g;n). ∀moves:strat2play(g;n;s). ∀i:ℕ(2 * n) + 1.
  ((((i mod 2) = 0 ∈ ℤ) ⇒ (↓Legal1(moves[i];moves[i + 1])))
  ∧ (((i mod 2) = 1 ∈ ℤ) ⇒ (↓Legal2(moves[i];moves[i + 1]))))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  strat2play: strat2play(g;n;s),  win2strat: win2strat(g;n),  play-item: moves[i],  sg-legal2: Legal2(x;y),  sg-legal1: Legal1(x;y),  simple-game: SimpleGame,  modulus: a mod n,  int_seg: {i..j-},  nat: ℕ,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  squash: ↓T,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  and: P ∧ Q,  multiply: n * m,  add: n + m,  natural_number: $n,  int: ℤ,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  and: P ∧ Q,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  nat: ℕ,  int_seg: {i..j-},  int_nzero: ℤ-o,  true: True,  nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T ,  not: ¬A,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  uimplies: b supposing a,  sq_type: SQType(T),  guard: {T},  false: False,  prop: ℙ,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  le: A ≤ B,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  nat_plus: ℕ+,  less_than: a < b,  squash: ↓T,  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  top: Top,  subtract: n - m,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  sq_stable: SqStable(P),  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q
Lemmas referenced :  strat2play-invariant-1,  int_seg_wf,  strat2play_wf,  win2strat_wf,  nat_wf,  simple-game_wf,  div_rem_sum,  subtype_base_sq,  int_subtype_base,  equal-wf-base,  true_wf,  nequal_wf,  rem_bounds_1,  int_seg_subtype_nat,  false_wf,  less_than_wf,  div_bounds_1,  equal_wf,  lelt_wf,  mul-commutes,  add-commutes,  subtract_wf,  add-associates,  minus-add,  minus-one-mul,  mul-associates,  add-swap,  add-mul-special,  mul-distributes-right,  two-mul,  zero-mul,  zero-add,  add-zero,  one-mul,  add-is-int-iff,  add_functionality_wrt_le,  le_reflexive,  less-iff-le,  not-lt-2,  omega-shadow,  mul-distributes,  int_seg_properties,  nat_properties,  decidable__lt,  modulus-is-rem,  equal-wf-T-base,  set_subtype_base,  sq_stable__le,  squash_wf,  add_functionality_wrt_eq,  subtype_rel_self,  iff_weakening_equal,  le-add-cancel
Rules used in proof :  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  lambdaFormation,  hypothesis,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  dependent_functionElimination,  thin,  hypothesisEquality,  productElimination,  isectElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  addEquality,  multiplyEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  addLevel,  instantiate,  cumulativity,  intEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  independent_functionElimination,  voidElimination,  baseClosed,  applyEquality,  sqequalRule,  independent_pairFormation,  imageMemberEquality,  because_Cache,  divideEquality,  dependent_pairFormation,  sqequalIntensionalEquality,  promote_hyp,  isect_memberEquality,  voidEquality,  baseApply,  closedConclusion,  minusEquality,  unionElimination,  remainderEquality,  lambdaEquality,  imageElimination,  universeEquality,  equalityUniverse,  levelHypothesis

Latex:
\mforall{}g:SimpleGame.  \mforall{}n:\mBbbN{}.  \mforall{}s:win2strat(g;n).  \mforall{}moves:strat2play(g;n;s).  \mforall{}i:\mBbbN{}(2  *  n)  +  1.
    ((((i  mod  2)  =  0)  {}\mRightarrow{}  (\mdownarrow{}Legal1(moves[i];moves[i  +  1])))
    \mwedge{}  (((i  mod  2)  =  1)  {}\mRightarrow{}  (\mdownarrow{}Legal2(moves[i];moves[i  +  1]))))



Date html generated: 2018_07_25-PM-01_33_11
Last ObjectModification: 2018_06_12-PM-00_38_49

Theory : co-recursion


Home Index