Nuprl Lemma : has-value-implies-dec-islambda

t,a,b:Base.  ((t)↓  ((t ~ λx.(t x)) ∨ (if is lambda then otherwise b)))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  has-value: (a)↓ islambda: if is lambda then otherwise b all: x:A. B[x] implies:  Q or: P ∨ Q apply: a lambda: λx.A[x] base: Base sqequal: t
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: x:A. B[x] implies:  Q has-value: (a)↓ member: t ∈ T uall: [x:A]. B[x] or: P ∨ Q top: Top guard: {T} prop:
Lemmas referenced :  base_wf top_wf is-exception_wf has-value_wf_base
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution sqequalTransitivity computationStep sqequalReflexivity lambdaFormation islambdaCases divergentSqle hypothesis cut lemma_by_obid sqequalHypSubstitution isectElimination thin baseClosed hypothesisEquality sqequalRule inlFormation sqequalIntensionalEquality isect_memberFormation introduction sqequalAxiom isect_memberEquality because_Cache voidElimination voidEquality inrFormation baseApply closedConclusion

Latex:
\mforall{}t,a,b:Base.    ((t)\mdownarrow{}  {}\mRightarrow{}  ((t  \msim{}  \mlambda{}x.(t  x))  \mvee{}  (if  t  is  lambda  then  a  otherwise  b  \msim{}  b)))



Date html generated: 2016_05_13-PM-03_22_46
Last ObjectModification: 2016_01_14-PM-06_46_33

Theory : call!by!value_1


Home Index