Nuprl Lemma : uniform-continuity-pi-pi-prop2

∀T:Type. ∀F:(ℕ ⟶ 𝔹) ⟶ T.  ((∀x,y:T.  Dec(x = y ∈ T)) ⇒ (∃n:ℕ. ucpB(T;F;n) ⇐⇒ ∃n:ℕ. ucA(T;F;n)))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  uniform-continuity-pi-pi: ucpB(T;F;n),  uniform-continuity-pi: ucA(T;F;n),  nat: ℕ,  bool: 𝔹,  decidable: Dec(P),  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  universe: Type,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  and: P ∧ Q,  member: t ∈ T,  prop: ℙ,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  uniform-continuity-pi-pi: ucpB(T;F;n),  uimplies: b supposing a,  nat: ℕ,  sq_type: SQType(T),  guard: {T},  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  le: A ≤ B,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  false: False,  not: ¬A,  int_seg: {i..j-},  ge: i ≥ j ,  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  top: Top,  squash: ↓T,  uniform-continuity-pi: ucA(T;F;n),  sq_stable: SqStable(P)
Lemmas referenced :  exists_wf,  nat_wf,  uniform-continuity-pi-pi_wf,  bool_wf,  uniform-continuity-pi_wf,  all_wf,  decidable_wf,  equal_wf,  set-value-type,  le_wf,  int-value-type,  subtype_base_sq,  set_subtype_base,  int_subtype_base,  uniform-continuity-pi-dec,  int_seg_subtype_nat,  false_wf,  int_seg_properties,  nat_properties,  decidable__lt,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformless_wf,  itermVar_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  int_seg_wf,  uniform-continuity-pi-search_wf,  subtype_rel_union,  not_wf,  top_wf,  or_wf,  uniform-continuity-pi-search-prop2,  itermAdd_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  lelt_wf,  decidable__le,  intformle_wf,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  subtype_rel_dep_function,  subtype_rel_self,  squash_wf,  sq_stable__all,  sq_stable__equal,  sq_stable__le,  le_weakening2
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  lambdaFormation,  independent_pairFormation,  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  hypothesis,  sqequalRule,  lambdaEquality,  cumulativity,  hypothesisEquality,  functionExtensionality,  applyEquality,  functionEquality,  universeEquality,  productElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  cutEval,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  independent_isectElimination,  intEquality,  natural_numberEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  instantiate,  dependent_functionElimination,  independent_functionElimination,  unionElimination,  int_eqEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  computeAll,  because_Cache,  addEquality,  applyLambdaEquality,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  imageElimination,  axiomEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}T:Type.  \mforall{}F:(\mBbbN{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbB{})  {}\mrightarrow{}  T.    ((\mforall{}x,y:T.    Dec(x  =  y))  {}\mRightarrow{}  (\mexists{}n:\mBbbN{}.  ucpB(T;F;n)  \mLeftarrow{}{}\mRightarrow{}  \mexists{}n:\mBbbN{}.  ucA(T;F;n)))



Date html generated: 2017_04_17-AM-09_59_09
Last ObjectModification: 2017_02_27-PM-05_53_20

Theory : continuity


Home Index