Nuprl Lemma : l_all_exists_injection

∀[A,B:Type]. ∀[R:A ⟶ B ⟶ ℙ]. ∀[P:B ⟶ ℙ].
  ∀L:A List
    ((∀x∈L.∃y:B. (R[x;y] ∧ P[y])) ⇒ (∃f:ℕ||L|| ⟶ {y:B| P[y]} . Inj(ℕ||L||;{y:B| P[y]} ;f))) supposing 
       (no_repeats(A;L) and 
       (∀x1,x2:A. ∀y:B.  (R[x1;y] ⇒ R[x2;y] ⇒ (x1 = x2 ∈ A))))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  l_all: (∀x∈L.P[x]),  no_repeats: no_repeats(T;l),  length: ||as||,  list: T List,  inject: Inj(A;B;f),  int_seg: {i..j-},  uimplies: b supposing a,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  prop: ℙ,  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  so_apply: x[s],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  and: P ∧ Q,  set: {x:A| B[x]} ,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  natural_number: $n,  universe: Type,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  uimplies: b supposing a,  member: t ∈ T,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  prop: ℙ,  l_all: (∀x∈L.P[x]),  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  and: P ∧ Q,  so_apply: x[s],  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  int_seg: {i..j-},  guard: {T},  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  false: False,  not: ¬A,  top: Top,  less_than: a < b,  squash: ↓T,  pi1: fst(t),  inject: Inj(A;B;f),  no_repeats: no_repeats(T;l),  le: A ≤ B,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  nat: ℕ,  ge: i ≥ j 
Lemmas referenced :  no_repeats_witness,  l_all_wf,  exists_wf,  l_member_wf,  no_repeats_wf,  all_wf,  equal_wf,  list_wf,  int_seg_wf,  length_wf,  select_wf,  int_seg_properties,  decidable__le,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  decidable__lt,  intformless_wf,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  inject_wf,  decidable__equal_int_seg,  int_seg_subtype_nat,  false_wf,  nat_properties,  set_wf,  le_wf,  intformeq_wf,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  lelt_wf,  nat_wf
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  lambdaFormation,  cut,  introduction,  sqequalRule,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  lambdaEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  thin,  hypothesisEquality,  axiomEquality,  hypothesis,  applyEquality,  functionExtensionality,  cumulativity,  universeEquality,  because_Cache,  rename,  extract_by_obid,  isectElimination,  independent_functionElimination,  productEquality,  setElimination,  setEquality,  functionEquality,  promote_hyp,  productElimination,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  natural_numberEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  unionElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  int_eqEquality,  intEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  computeAll,  imageElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  hyp_replacement

Latex:
\mforall{}[A,B:Type].  \mforall{}[R:A  {}\mrightarrow{}  B  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbP{}].  \mforall{}[P:B  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbP{}].
    \mforall{}L:A  List
        ((\mforall{}x\mmember{}L.\mexists{}y:B.  (R[x;y]  \mwedge{}  P[y]))  {}\mRightarrow{}  (\mexists{}f:\mBbbN{}||L||  {}\mrightarrow{}  \{y:B|  P[y]\}  .  Inj(\mBbbN{}||L||;\{y:B|  P[y]\}  ;f)))  suppos\000Cing 
              (no\_repeats(A;L)  and 
              (\mforall{}x1,x2:A.  \mforall{}y:B.    (R[x1;y]  {}\mRightarrow{}  R[x2;y]  {}\mRightarrow{}  (x1  =  x2))))



Date html generated: 2016_10_21-AM-10_27_12
Last ObjectModification: 2016_07_12-AM-05_40_33

Theory : list_1


Home Index