Nuprl Lemma : pair_support

∀[n:ℕ]. ∀[f:ℕn ⟶ ℤ]. ∀[m,k:ℕn].
  (Σ(f[x] | x < n) = (f[m] + f[k]) ∈ ℤ) supposing 
     ((∀x:ℕn. ((¬(x = m ∈ ℤ)) ⇒ (¬(x = k ∈ ℤ)) ⇒ (f[x] = 0 ∈ ℤ))) and 
     (¬(m = k ∈ ℤ)))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  sum: Σ(f[x] | x < k),  int_seg: {i..j-},  nat: ℕ,  uimplies: b supposing a,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  so_apply: x[s],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  not: ¬A,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  add: n + m,  natural_number: $n,  int: ℤ,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  uimplies: b supposing a,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  int_seg: {i..j-},  prop: ℙ,  so_apply: x[s],  nat: ℕ,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  and: P ∧ Q,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  bfalse: ff,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  or: P ∨ Q,  sq_type: SQType(T),  guard: {T},  bnot: ¬bb,  assert: ↑b,  false: False,  squash: ↓T,  nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T ,  true: True,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  ge: i ≥ j ,  not: ¬A,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  top: Top,  decidable: Dec(P)
Lemmas referenced :  not_wf,  equal_wf,  equal-wf-T-base,  all_wf,  int_seg_wf,  nat_wf,  isolate_summand,  singleton_support_sum,  ifthenelse_wf,  eq_int_wf,  bool_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_eq_int,  eqff_to_assert,  bool_cases_sqequal,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  neg_assert_of_eq_int,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  subtype_rel_self,  iff_weakening_equal,  eq_int_eq_false,  int_seg_properties,  nat_properties,  full-omega-unsat,  intformand_wf,  intformeq_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformnot_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  equal-wf-base,  int_subtype_base,  bfalse_wf,  false_wf,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  itermAdd_wf,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  add-is-int-iff,  decidable__equal_int
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  Error :isect_memberFormation_alt,  introduction,  cut,  hypothesis,  sqequalRule,  Error :functionIsType,  Error :inhabitedIsType,  hypothesisEquality,  Error :universeIsType,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  intEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  because_Cache,  applyEquality,  baseClosed,  isect_memberEquality,  axiomEquality,  natural_numberEquality,  lambdaEquality,  functionEquality,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  independent_isectElimination,  lambdaFormation,  unionElimination,  equalityElimination,  productElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  promote_hyp,  dependent_functionElimination,  instantiate,  cumulativity,  independent_functionElimination,  voidElimination,  imageElimination,  universeEquality,  imageMemberEquality,  approximateComputation,  int_eqEquality,  voidEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  computeAll,  closedConclusion,  baseApply,  pointwiseFunctionality

Latex:
\mforall{}[n:\mBbbN{}].  \mforall{}[f:\mBbbN{}n  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbZ{}].  \mforall{}[m,k:\mBbbN{}n].
    (\mSigma{}(f[x]  |  x  <  n)  =  (f[m]  +  f[k]))  supposing 
          ((\mforall{}x:\mBbbN{}n.  ((\mneg{}(x  =  m))  {}\mRightarrow{}  (\mneg{}(x  =  k))  {}\mRightarrow{}  (f[x]  =  0)))  and 
          (\mneg{}(m  =  k)))



Date html generated: 2019_06_20-PM-02_29_27
Last ObjectModification: 2018_09_26-PM-06_03_38

Theory : num_thy_1


Home Index