Nuprl Lemma : bar-base-exteq
∀[T:Type]. bar-base(T) ≡ T + bar-base(T)
Proof
Definitions occuring in Statement :
bar-base: bar-base(T),
ext-eq: A ≡ B,
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],
union: left + right,
universe: Type
Definitions unfolded in proof :
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],
member: t ∈ T,
so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],
so_apply: x[s],
uimplies: b supposing a,
all: ∀x:A. B[x],
implies: P ⇒ Q,
bar-base: bar-base(T),
ext-eq: A ≡ B,
and: P ∧ Q,
subtype_rel: A ⊆r B
Lemmas referenced :
corec-ext,
continuous-monotone-union,
continuous-monotone-constant,
continuous-monotone-id
Rules used in proof :
sqequalSubstitution,
sqequalTransitivity,
computationStep,
sqequalReflexivity,
isect_memberFormation,
introduction,
cut,
lemma_by_obid,
sqequalHypSubstitution,
isectElimination,
thin,
sqequalRule,
lambdaEquality,
unionEquality,
hypothesisEquality,
universeEquality,
independent_isectElimination,
dependent_functionElimination,
independent_functionElimination,
hypothesis,
productElimination,
independent_pairEquality,
axiomEquality
Latex:
\mforall{}[T:Type]. bar-base(T) \mequiv{} T + bar-base(T)
Date html generated:
2016_05_14-AM-06_19_34
Last ObjectModification:
2015_12_26-PM-00_01_57
Theory : co-recursion
Home
Index