Nuprl Lemma : fpf-join-empty-sq

[A:Type]. ∀[B:A ⟶ Type]. ∀[f:a:A fp-> B[a]]. ∀[eq:EqDecider(A)].  (⊗ ⊕ ~ <fst(f), λa.((snd(f)) a)>)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  fpf-join: f ⊕ g fpf-empty: fpf: a:A fp-> B[a] deq: EqDecider(T) uall: [x:A]. B[x] so_apply: x[s] pi1: fst(t) pi2: snd(t) apply: a lambda: λx.A[x] function: x:A ⟶ B[x] pair: <a, b> universe: Type sqequal: t
Definitions unfolded in proof :  fpf: a:A fp-> B[a] fpf-empty: fpf-join: f ⊕ g pi1: fst(t) all: x:A. B[x] member: t ∈ T top: Top pi2: snd(t) append: as bs so_lambda: so_lambda(x,y,z.t[x; y; z]) so_apply: x[s1;s2;s3] fpf-cap: f(x)?z fpf-dom: x ∈ dom(f) bnot: ¬bb ifthenelse: if then else fi  bfalse: ff uall: [x:A]. B[x] subtype_rel: A ⊆B uimplies: supposing a so_lambda: λ2x.t[x] so_apply: x[s]
Lemmas referenced :  fpf_ap_pair_lemma list_ind_nil_lemma deq_member_nil_lemma filter_tt subtype_rel_list top_wf deq_wf fpf_wf
Rules used in proof :  sqequalHypSubstitution sqequalSubstitution sqequalTransitivity computationStep sqequalReflexivity productElimination thin sqequalRule cut lemma_by_obid dependent_functionElimination isect_memberEquality voidElimination voidEquality hypothesis isectElimination hypothesisEquality applyEquality independent_isectElimination lambdaEquality because_Cache functionEquality cumulativity universeEquality isect_memberFormation introduction sqequalAxiom

Latex:
\mforall{}[A:Type].  \mforall{}[B:A  {}\mrightarrow{}  Type].  \mforall{}[f:a:A  fp->  B[a]].  \mforall{}[eq:EqDecider(A)].
    (\motimes{}  \moplus{}  f  \msim{}  <fst(f),  \mlambda{}a.((snd(f))  a)>)



Date html generated: 2018_05_21-PM-09_21_09
Last ObjectModification: 2018_02_09-AM-10_18_11

Theory : finite!partial!functions


Home Index