Nuprl Lemma : iseg_extend

∀[T:Type]. ∀l1:T List. ∀v:T. ∀l2:T List.  (l1 ≤ l2 ⇒ l1 @ [v] ≤ l2 supposing ||l1|| < ||l2|| c∧ (l2[||l1||] = v ∈ T))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  iseg: l1 ≤ l2,  select: L[n],  length: ||as||,  append: as @ bs,  cons: [a / b],  nil: [],  list: T List,  less_than: a < b,  uimplies: b supposing a,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  cand: A c∧ B,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  universe: Type,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  iseg: l1 ≤ l2,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  uimplies: b supposing a,  member: t ∈ T,  cand: A c∧ B,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  prop: ℙ,  ge: i ≥ j ,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  le: A ≤ B,  and: P ∧ Q,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  false: False,  not: ¬A,  top: Top,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  less_than: a < b,  squash: ↓T,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  int_seg: {i..j-},  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  true: True,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  guard: {T},  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  subtract: n - m,  sq_type: SQType(T),  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  nat: ℕ,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  append: as @ bs,  so_lambda: so_lambda(x,y,z.t[x; y; z]),  so_apply: x[s1;s2;s3],  select: L[n],  nil: [],  it: ⋅,  so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  cons: [a / b]
Lemmas referenced :  member-less_than,  length_wf,  tl_wf,  equal_wf,  list_wf,  append_wf,  cons_wf,  nil_wf,  less_than_wf,  select_wf,  non_neg_length,  decidable__le,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  exists_wf,  append_assoc,  length-append,  decidable__lt,  add-is-int-iff,  intformless_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  false_wf,  length_wf_nat,  nat_wf,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  select_append_back,  lelt_wf,  iff_weakening_equal,  minus-one-mul,  add-mul-special,  zero-mul,  subtype_base_sq,  int_subtype_base,  and_wf,  list_induction,  length_of_nil_lemma,  list_ind_cons_lemma,  stuck-spread,  base_wf,  list_ind_nil_lemma,  reduce_tl_nil_lemma,  length_of_cons_lemma,  reduce_tl_cons_lemma
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalRule,  sqequalReflexivity,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  isect_memberFormation,  lambdaFormation,  cut,  introduction,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  productElimination,  thin,  independent_pairEquality,  extract_by_obid,  isectElimination,  cumulativity,  hypothesisEquality,  hypothesis,  independent_isectElimination,  axiomEquality,  rename,  dependent_pairFormation,  productEquality,  because_Cache,  dependent_functionElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  unionElimination,  lambdaEquality,  int_eqEquality,  intEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  computeAll,  universeEquality,  hyp_replacement,  equalitySymmetry,  applyLambdaEquality,  imageElimination,  pointwiseFunctionality,  equalityTransitivity,  promote_hyp,  baseApply,  closedConclusion,  baseClosed,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  addEquality,  setElimination,  applyEquality,  imageMemberEquality,  independent_functionElimination,  instantiate,  functionEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}[T:Type]
    \mforall{}l1:T  List.  \mforall{}v:T.  \mforall{}l2:T  List.
        (l1  \mleq{}  l2  {}\mRightarrow{}  l1  @  [v]  \mleq{}  l2  supposing  ||l1||  <  ||l2||  c\mwedge{}  (l2[||l1||]  =  v))



Date html generated: 2017_04_17-AM-07_31_05
Last ObjectModification: 2017_02_27-PM-04_08_58

Theory : list_1


Home Index