Nuprl Lemma : lcm-unique-nat

∀n,m,l:ℕ.  ((((n | l) ∧ (m | l)) ∧ (∀v:ℤ. ((n | v) ⇒ (m | v) ⇒ (l | v)))) ⇒ (l = lcm(n;m) ∈ ℤ))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  lcm: lcm(a;b),  divides: b | a,  nat: ℕ,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  and: P ∧ Q,  int: ℤ,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  and: P ∧ Q,  member: t ∈ T,  nat: ℕ,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  uimplies: b supposing a,  sq_type: SQType(T),  guard: {T},  prop: ℙ,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  divides: b | a,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  lcm: lcm(a;b),  has-value: (a)↓,  eq_int: (i =z j),  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  btrue: tt,  ge: i ≥ j ,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  false: False,  not: ¬A,  top: Top,  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  bfalse: ff,  bnot: ¬bb,  assert: ↑b,  nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T ,  nat_plus: ℕ+,  le: A ≤ B,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  true: True,  subtract: n - m,  cand: A c∧ B
Lemmas referenced :  decidable__equal_int,  subtype_base_sq,  int_subtype_base,  divides_wf,  all_wf,  nat_wf,  value-type-has-value,  int-value-type,  set-value-type,  le_wf,  gcd_wf,  nat_properties,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformeq_wf,  itermVar_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermMultiply_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_mul_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  eq_int_wf,  bool_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_eq_int,  eqff_to_assert,  equal_wf,  bool_cases_sqequal,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  neg_assert_of_eq_int,  lcm-unique,  decidable__lt,  false_wf,  not-lt-2,  not-equal-2,  add_functionality_wrt_le,  add-associates,  add-zero,  zero-add,  le-add-cancel,  condition-implies-le,  add-commutes,  minus-add,  minus-zero,  less_than_wf,  int_entire,  intformor_wf,  int_formula_prop_or_lemma
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  lambdaFormation,  cut,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  productElimination,  thin,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  dependent_functionElimination,  setElimination,  rename,  because_Cache,  hypothesis,  natural_numberEquality,  unionElimination,  instantiate,  isectElimination,  cumulativity,  intEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  independent_functionElimination,  productEquality,  hypothesisEquality,  sqequalRule,  lambdaEquality,  functionEquality,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  callbyvalueReduce,  dependent_pairFormation,  int_eqEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  computeAll,  equalityElimination,  promote_hyp,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  addEquality,  applyEquality,  minusEquality,  multiplyEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}n,m,l:\mBbbN{}.    ((((n  |  l)  \mwedge{}  (m  |  l))  \mwedge{}  (\mforall{}v:\mBbbZ{}.  ((n  |  v)  {}\mRightarrow{}  (m  |  v)  {}\mRightarrow{}  (l  |  v))))  {}\mRightarrow{}  (l  =  lcm(n;m)))



Date html generated: 2017_04_17-AM-09_46_51
Last ObjectModification: 2017_02_27-PM-05_41_09

Theory : num_thy_1


Home Index