Nuprl Lemma : strongwellfounded_rel_exp

∀[T:Type]. ∀[R:T ⟶ T ⟶ ℙ]. ∀[swf:SWellFounded(x R y)]. ∀[n:ℕ+]. ∀[x,y:T].
  (((fst(swf)) x) + n) ≤ ((fst(swf)) y) supposing x R^n y


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  strongwellfounded: SWellFounded(R[x; y]),  rel_exp: R^n,  nat_plus: ℕ+,  uimplies: b supposing a,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  prop: ℙ,  infix_ap: x f y,  pi1: fst(t),  le: A ≤ B,  apply: f a,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  add: n + m,  universe: Type
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  uimplies: b supposing a,  member: t ∈ T,  le: A ≤ B,  and: P ∧ Q,  infix_ap: x f y,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  prop: ℙ,  so_apply: x[s],  top: Top,  not: ¬A,  false: False,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  or: P ∨ Q,  decidable: Dec(P),  nat: ℕ,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  nat_plus: ℕ+,  bfalse: ff,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  subtract: n - m,  eq_int: (i =z j),  rel_exp: R^n,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  pi1: fst(t),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  strongwellfounded: SWellFounded(R[x; y]),  squash: ↓T,  less_than: a < b,  btrue: tt,  assert: ↑b,  bnot: ¬bb,  guard: {T},  sq_type: SQType(T),  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  it: ⋅,  unit: Unit,  bool: 𝔹,  nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T 
Lemmas referenced :  le_witness_for_triv,  rel_exp_wf,  nat_plus_subtype_nat,  istype-universe,  nat_plus_wf,  strongwellfounded_wf,  primrec-wf-nat-plus,  nat_wf,  le_wf,  int_formula_prop_wf,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  intformless_wf,  itermVar_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  intformle_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformand_wf,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  decidable__le,  infix_ap_wf,  all_wf,  nat_plus_properties,  equal_wf,  exists_wf,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  itermAdd_wf,  less_than_wf,  neg_assert_of_eq_int,  assert-bnot,  bool_subtype_base,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_cases_sqequal,  eqff_to_assert,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  intformeq_wf,  assert_of_eq_int,  eqtt_to_assert,  bool_wf,  eq_int_wf,  add-subtract-cancel
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  Error :isect_memberFormation_alt,  introduction,  cut,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  productElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  hypothesis,  equalitySymmetry,  independent_isectElimination,  Error :universeIsType,  applyEquality,  hypothesisEquality,  sqequalRule,  because_Cache,  Error :inhabitedIsType,  Error :lambdaEquality_alt,  Error :functionIsType,  universeEquality,  independent_functionElimination,  addEquality,  functionExtensionality,  computeAll,  independent_pairFormation,  voidEquality,  voidElimination,  isect_memberEquality,  intEquality,  int_eqEquality,  dependent_pairFormation,  unionElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  instantiate,  functionEquality,  lambdaEquality,  cumulativity,  setElimination,  lambdaFormation,  rename,  productEquality,  imageElimination,  applyLambdaEquality,  hyp_replacement,  promote_hyp,  equalityElimination

Latex:
\mforall{}[T:Type].  \mforall{}[R:T  {}\mrightarrow{}  T  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbP{}].  \mforall{}[swf:SWellFounded(x  R  y)].  \mforall{}[n:\mBbbN{}\msupplus{}].  \mforall{}[x,y:T].
    (((fst(swf))  x)  +  n)  \mleq{}  ((fst(swf))  y)  supposing  x  rel\_exp(T;  R;  n)  y



Date html generated: 2019_06_20-PM-02_01_50
Last ObjectModification: 2018_10_06-AM-11_23_54

Theory : relations2


Home Index