Nuprl Lemma : anti_sym_wf
∀[T:Type]. ∀[R:T ⟶ T ⟶ ℙ]. (AntiSym(T;x,y.R[x;y]) ∈ ℙ)
Proof
Definitions occuring in Statement :
anti_sym: AntiSym(T;x,y.R[x; y]),
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],
prop: ℙ,
so_apply: x[s1;s2],
member: t ∈ T,
function: x:A ⟶ B[x],
universe: Type
Definitions unfolded in proof :
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],
member: t ∈ T,
anti_sym: AntiSym(T;x,y.R[x; y]),
so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],
implies: P ⇒ Q,
prop: ℙ,
so_apply: x[s1;s2],
so_apply: x[s]
Lemmas referenced :
all_wf,
equal_wf
Rules used in proof :
sqequalSubstitution,
sqequalTransitivity,
computationStep,
sqequalReflexivity,
isect_memberFormation,
introduction,
cut,
sqequalRule,
extract_by_obid,
sqequalHypSubstitution,
isectElimination,
thin,
cumulativity,
hypothesisEquality,
lambdaEquality,
functionEquality,
applyEquality,
functionExtensionality,
hypothesis,
axiomEquality,
equalityTransitivity,
equalitySymmetry,
universeEquality,
isect_memberEquality,
because_Cache
Latex:
\mforall{}[T:Type]. \mforall{}[R:T {}\mrightarrow{} T {}\mrightarrow{} \mBbbP{}]. (AntiSym(T;x,y.R[x;y]) \mmember{} \mBbbP{})
Date html generated:
2016_10_21-AM-09_42_06
Last ObjectModification:
2016_08_01-PM-09_49_25
Theory : rel_1
Home
Index