Nuprl Lemma : irrefl_wf

[T:Type]. ∀[E:T ⟶ T ⟶ ℙ].  (Irrefl(T;x,y.E[x;y]) ∈ ℙ)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  irrefl: Irrefl(T;x,y.E[x; y]) uall: [x:A]. B[x] prop: so_apply: x[s1;s2] member: t ∈ T function: x:A ⟶ B[x] universe: Type
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: [x:A]. B[x] member: t ∈ T irrefl: Irrefl(T;x,y.E[x; y]) so_lambda: λ2x.t[x] so_apply: x[s1;s2] so_apply: x[s] prop:
Lemmas referenced :  uall_wf not_wf
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution sqequalTransitivity computationStep sqequalReflexivity Error :isect_memberFormation_alt,  introduction cut sqequalRule extract_by_obid sqequalHypSubstitution isectElimination thin hypothesisEquality lambdaEquality applyEquality hypothesis axiomEquality equalityTransitivity equalitySymmetry Error :functionIsType,  Error :universeIsType,  Error :inhabitedIsType,  universeEquality isect_memberEquality functionEquality cumulativity

Latex:
\mforall{}[T:Type].  \mforall{}[E:T  {}\mrightarrow{}  T  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbP{}].    (Irrefl(T;x,y.E[x;y])  \mmember{}  \mBbbP{})



Date html generated: 2019_06_20-PM-00_29_57
Last ObjectModification: 2018_09_26-AM-11_48_19

Theory : rel_1


Home Index