Nuprl Lemma : dl-valid-box-choose

a,b:Prog. ∀phi:Prop.  |= [a] phi  [b] phi  [a ⋃ b] phi


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  dl-valid: |= phi dl-box: [x1] x dl-implies: x1  x dl-choose: x1 ⋃ x dl-prop: Prop dl-prog: Prog all: x:A. B[x]
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: x:A. B[x] dl-valid: |= phi member: t ∈ T prop: uall: [x:A]. B[x] dl-prop-sem: [|phi|] dl-sem: dl-sem(K;n.R[n];m.P[m]) so_lambda: λ2x.t[x] top: Top so_apply: x[s] so_lambda: so_lambda(x,y,z,w.t[x; y; z; w]) so_apply: x[s1;s2;s3;s4] so_lambda: λ2y.t[x; y] so_apply: x[s1;s2] dl-prog-sem: [|alpha|] implies:  Q or: P ∨ Q subtype_rel: A ⊆B guard: {T}
Lemmas referenced :  istype-atom istype-universe istype-void dl-prog-sem_wf subtype_rel_self dl-prop-sem_wf
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution sqequalTransitivity computationStep sqequalReflexivity lambdaFormation_alt universeIsType hypothesisEquality functionIsType cut introduction extract_by_obid hypothesis universeEquality because_Cache thin instantiate sqequalHypSubstitution isectElimination inhabitedIsType sqequalRule isect_memberEquality_alt voidElimination unionElimination unionIsType applyEquality lambdaEquality_alt dependent_functionElimination independent_functionElimination

Latex:
\mforall{}a,b:Prog.  \mforall{}phi:Prop.    |=  [a]  phi  {}\mRightarrow{}  [b]  phi  {}\mRightarrow{}  [a  \mcup{}  b]  phi



Date html generated: 2019_10_15-AM-11_44_20
Last ObjectModification: 2019_03_26-AM-11_28_30

Theory : dynamic!logic


Home Index