Nuprl Lemma : dl-valid-trivial

phi:Prop. |= phi  phi


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  dl-valid: |= phi dl-implies: x1  x dl-prop: Prop all: x:A. B[x]
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: x:A. B[x] dl-valid: |= phi member: t ∈ T prop: uall: [x:A]. B[x] dl-prop-sem: [|phi|] dl-sem: dl-sem(K;n.R[n];m.P[m]) so_lambda: λ2x.t[x] top: Top so_apply: x[s] so_lambda: so_lambda(x,y,z,w.t[x; y; z; w]) so_apply: x[s1;s2;s3;s4] so_lambda: λ2y.t[x; y] so_apply: x[s1;s2] implies:  Q subtype_rel: A ⊆B
Lemmas referenced :  istype-nat istype-universe dl-prop_wf dl-ind-dl-implies istype-void dl-prop-sem_wf subtype_rel_self
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution sqequalTransitivity computationStep sqequalReflexivity lambdaFormation_alt universeIsType hypothesisEquality functionIsType cut introduction extract_by_obid hypothesis universeEquality because_Cache thin instantiate sqequalHypSubstitution isectElimination sqequalRule isect_memberEquality_alt voidElimination applyEquality lambdaEquality_alt

Latex:
\mforall{}phi:Prop.  |=  phi  {}\mRightarrow{}  phi



Date html generated: 2019_10_15-AM-11_44_17
Last ObjectModification: 2019_03_26-AM-11_50_15

Theory : dynamic!logic


Home Index