Nuprl Lemma : non-forking_wf

[T:Type]. ∀[R:T ⟶ T ⟶ ℙ].  (non-forking(T;x,y.R[x;y]) ∈ ℙ)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  non-forking: non-forking(T;x,y.R[x; y]) uall: [x:A]. B[x] prop: so_apply: x[s1;s2] member: t ∈ T function: x:A ⟶ B[x] universe: Type
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: [x:A]. B[x] member: t ∈ T non-forking: non-forking(T;x,y.R[x; y]) so_lambda: λ2x.t[x] implies:  Q prop: so_apply: x[s1;s2] so_apply: x[s]
Lemmas referenced :  all_wf equal_wf
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution sqequalTransitivity computationStep sqequalReflexivity isect_memberFormation introduction cut sqequalRule lemma_by_obid sqequalHypSubstitution isectElimination thin hypothesisEquality lambdaEquality functionEquality applyEquality hypothesis axiomEquality equalityTransitivity equalitySymmetry cumulativity universeEquality isect_memberEquality because_Cache

Latex:
\mforall{}[T:Type].  \mforall{}[R:T  {}\mrightarrow{}  T  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbP{}].    (non-forking(T;x,y.R[x;y])  \mmember{}  \mBbbP{})



Date html generated: 2016_05_15-PM-07_51_57
Last ObjectModification: 2015_12_27-AM-11_03_57

Theory : general


Home Index