Nuprl Lemma : nh-comp-nc-m

∀[I,K:fset(ℕ)]. ∀[i,j:ℕ]. ∀[f:K ⟶ I+j].  (m(i;j) ⋅ f i) = f i ∧ f j ∈ Point(dM(K)) supposing i ∈ I


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  nc-m: m(i;j),  add-name: I+i,  nh-comp: g ⋅ f,  names-hom: I ⟶ J,  dM: dM(I),  lattice-meet: a ∧ b,  lattice-point: Point(l),  fset-member: a ∈ s,  fset: fset(T),  int-deq: IntDeq,  nat: ℕ,  uimplies: b supposing a,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  apply: f a,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  uimplies: b supposing a,  names: names(I),  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  and: P ∧ Q,  guard: {T},  or: P ∨ Q,  prop: ℙ,  nat: ℕ,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  top: Top,  nc-m: m(i;j),  compose: f o g,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  squash: ↓T,  DeMorgan-algebra: DeMorganAlgebra,  names-hom: I ⟶ J,  true: True,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  bfalse: ff,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  sq_type: SQType(T),  bnot: ¬bb,  assert: ↑b,  false: False,  nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T ,  ge: i ≥ j ,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  not: ¬A
Lemmas referenced :  fset-member-add-name,  equal_wf,  fset-member_wf,  nat_wf,  int-deq_wf,  add-name_wf,  trivial-member-add-name1,  strong-subtype-deq-subtype,  strong-subtype-set3,  le_wf,  strong-subtype-self,  nh-comp-sq,  eq_int_wf,  bool_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_eq_int,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  lattice-point_wf,  dM_wf,  subtype_rel_set,  DeMorgan-algebra-structure_wf,  lattice-structure_wf,  lattice-axioms_wf,  bounded-lattice-structure-subtype,  DeMorgan-algebra-structure-subtype,  subtype_rel_transitivity,  bounded-lattice-structure_wf,  bounded-lattice-axioms_wf,  uall_wf,  lattice-meet_wf,  lattice-join_wf,  DeMorgan-algebra-axioms_wf,  dM-lift-dMpair,  iff_weakening_equal,  eqff_to_assert,  bool_cases_sqequal,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  neg_assert_of_eq_int,  nat_properties,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformnot_wf,  intformeq_wf,  itermVar_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  names-hom_wf,  fset_wf
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  introduction,  cut,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  hypothesisEquality,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  dependent_functionElimination,  thin,  because_Cache,  productElimination,  independent_isectElimination,  sqequalRule,  hypothesis,  inrFormation,  isectElimination,  intEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  applyEquality,  lambdaEquality,  natural_numberEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  lambdaFormation,  unionElimination,  equalityElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  imageElimination,  universeEquality,  instantiate,  productEquality,  cumulativity,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  independent_functionElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  promote_hyp,  int_eqEquality,  computeAll,  axiomEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}[I,K:fset(\mBbbN{})].  \mforall{}[i,j:\mBbbN{}].  \mforall{}[f:K  {}\mrightarrow{}  I+j].    (m(i;j)  \mcdot{}  f  i)  =  f  i  \mwedge{}  f  j  supposing  i  \mmember{}  I



Date html generated: 2017_10_05-AM-01_03_15
Last ObjectModification: 2017_07_28-AM-09_26_36

Theory : cubical!type!theory


Home Index