Nuprl Lemma : seq-add_wf_consistent

∀T:Type. ∀R:n:ℕ ⟶ (ℕn ⟶ T) ⟶ T ⟶ ℙ. ∀n:ℕ. ∀s:R-consistent-seq(n). ∀t:T.
  ((R n s t) ⇒ (s.t@n ∈ R-consistent-seq(n + 1)))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  consistent-seq: R-consistent-seq(n),  seq-add: s.x@n,  int_seg: {i..j-},  nat: ℕ,  prop: ℙ,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  member: t ∈ T,  apply: f a,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  add: n + m,  natural_number: $n,  universe: Type
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  member: t ∈ T,  consistent-seq: R-consistent-seq(n),  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  nat: ℕ,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  uimplies: b supposing a,  le: A ≤ B,  and: P ∧ Q,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  false: False,  not: ¬A,  prop: ℙ,  so_apply: x[s],  int_seg: {i..j-},  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  guard: {T},  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  seq-add: s.x@n,  sq_stable: SqStable(P),  squash: ↓T,  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  bfalse: ff,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  sq_type: SQType(T),  bnot: ¬bb,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  assert: ↑b,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  less_than: a < b,  subtract: n - m,  top: Top,  true: True
Lemmas referenced :  seq-add_wf,  int_seg_wf,  all_wf,  nat_wf,  int_seg_subtype_nat,  false_wf,  subtype_rel_dep_function,  subtype_rel_sets,  and_wf,  le_wf,  less_than_wf,  less_than_transitivity2,  le_weakening2,  consistent-seq_wf,  decidable__int_equal,  sq_stable__le,  equal_wf,  subtype_rel_self,  subtype_rel_wf,  eq_int_wf,  bool_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_eq_int,  less_than_transitivity1,  le_weakening,  less_than_irreflexivity,  eqff_to_assert,  bool_cases_sqequal,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_subtype_base,  iff_transitivity,  assert_wf,  bnot_wf,  not_wf,  iff_weakening_uiff,  assert_of_bnot,  le_antisymmetry_iff,  less-iff-le,  condition-implies-le,  add-associates,  minus-add,  minus-one-mul,  add-swap,  minus-one-mul-top,  zero-add,  add_functionality_wrt_le,  add-commutes,  le-add-cancel2,  decidable__lt,  not-lt-2,  not-equal-2,  le-add-cancel
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  lambdaFormation,  cut,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  setElimination,  thin,  rename,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  isectElimination,  cumulativity,  hypothesisEquality,  functionExtensionality,  applyEquality,  natural_numberEquality,  hypothesis,  addEquality,  because_Cache,  sqequalRule,  lambdaEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  independent_pairFormation,  intEquality,  setEquality,  productElimination,  dependent_functionElimination,  functionEquality,  universeEquality,  unionElimination,  int_eqReduceTrueSq,  addLevel,  hyp_replacement,  equalitySymmetry,  levelHypothesis,  independent_functionElimination,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  imageElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  instantiate,  applyLambdaEquality,  equalityElimination,  voidElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  promote_hyp,  impliesFunctionality,  int_eqReduceFalseSq,  isect_memberEquality,  voidEquality,  minusEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}T:Type.  \mforall{}R:n:\mBbbN{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  (\mBbbN{}n  {}\mrightarrow{}  T)  {}\mrightarrow{}  T  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbP{}.  \mforall{}n:\mBbbN{}.  \mforall{}s:R-consistent-seq(n).  \mforall{}t:T.
    ((R  n  s  t)  {}\mRightarrow{}  (s.t@n  \mmember{}  R-consistent-seq(n  +  1)))



Date html generated: 2017_04_14-AM-07_26_34
Last ObjectModification: 2017_02_27-PM-02_55_55

Theory : bar-induction


Home Index