Nuprl Lemma : stump'-inductive

∀T:Type. ∀t:wfd-tree(T).
  (stump'(t)
  = wfd-tree-rec(λn,s. (n =z 0);r.λn,s. if (n =z 0) then ff else r (s 0) (n - 1) (λi.(s (i + 1))) fi ;t)
  ∈ (n:ℕ ⟶ (ℕn ⟶ T) ⟶ 𝔹))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  stump': stump'(t),  wfd-tree-rec: wfd-tree-rec(b;r.F[r];t),  wfd-tree: wfd-tree(T),  int_seg: {i..j-},  nat: ℕ,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  eq_int: (i =z j),  bfalse: ff,  bool: 𝔹,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  apply: f a,  lambda: λx.A[x],  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  subtract: n - m,  add: n + m,  natural_number: $n,  universe: Type,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  nat: ℕ,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  and: P ∧ Q,  uimplies: b supposing a,  bfalse: ff,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  prop: ℙ,  or: P ∨ Q,  sq_type: SQType(T),  guard: {T},  bnot: ¬bb,  assert: ↑b,  false: False,  le: A ≤ B,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  not: ¬A,  ge: i ≥ j ,  int_upper: {i...},  int_seg: {i..j-},  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  decidable: Dec(P),  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  top: Top,  true: True,  sq_stable: SqStable(P),  squash: ↓T,  subtract: n - m,  so_apply: x[s],  stump': stump'(t),  stump: stump(t),  empty-wfd-tree: empty-wfd-tree(t),  band: p ∧b q,  wfd-tree-rec: wfd-tree-rec(b;r.F[r];t),  W-rec: W-rec(a,f,r.F[a; f; r];w),  Wsup: Wsup(a;b),  less_than: a < b,  nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T 
Lemmas referenced :  wfd-tree-induction,  equal_wf,  nat_wf,  int_seg_wf,  bool_wf,  stump'_wf,  wfd-tree-rec_wf,  eq_int_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_eq_int,  bfalse_wf,  eqff_to_assert,  bool_cases_sqequal,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  neg_assert_of_eq_int,  int_upper_subtype_nat,  false_wf,  le_wf,  nat_properties,  nequal-le-implies,  zero-add,  decidable__lt,  not-lt-2,  add_functionality_wrt_le,  add-commutes,  le-add-cancel,  lelt_wf,  subtract_wf,  decidable__le,  not-le-2,  sq_stable__le,  condition-implies-le,  minus-one-mul,  minus-one-mul-top,  minus-add,  minus-minus,  add-associates,  add-swap,  add-member-int_seg2,  add-zero,  le-add-cancel2,  wfd-tree_wf,  all_wf,  wfd_tree_rec_leaf_lemma,  btrue_wf,  wfd_tree_rec_node_lemma,  int_subtype_base,  stump-nil,  le_antisymmetry_iff,  minus-zero,  le-add-cancel-alt,  less_than_transitivity1,  less_than_irreflexivity,  bnot_wf,  stump_wf,  not-equal-2,  less-iff-le,  int_upper_wf,  empty-wfd-tree_wf
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  lambdaFormation,  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  hypothesisEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  sqequalRule,  lambdaEquality,  functionEquality,  hypothesis,  natural_numberEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  because_Cache,  cumulativity,  unionElimination,  equalityElimination,  productElimination,  independent_isectElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  dependent_pairFormation,  promote_hyp,  instantiate,  independent_functionElimination,  voidElimination,  hypothesis_subsumption,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  applyEquality,  functionExtensionality,  isect_memberEquality,  voidEquality,  intEquality,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  imageElimination,  addEquality,  minusEquality,  universeEquality,  applyLambdaEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}T:Type.  \mforall{}t:wfd-tree(T).
    (stump'(t)
    =  wfd-tree-rec(\mlambda{}n,s.  (n  =\msubz{}  0);r.\mlambda{}n,s.  if  (n  =\msubz{}  0)  then  ff  else  r  (s  0)  (n  -  1)  (\mlambda{}i.(s  (i  +  1)))  fi\000C  ;t))



Date html generated: 2017_04_14-AM-07_45_37
Last ObjectModification: 2017_02_27-PM-03_16_57

Theory : co-recursion


Home Index