Nuprl Lemma : weak-Markov-principle2

∀a:ℕ*. ((∀c:ℕ*. ((¬¬(∃n:ℕ. (¬((a n) = (c n) ∈ ℤ)))) ∨ (¬¬(∃n:ℕ. (¬(0 = (c n) ∈ ℤ)))))) ⇒ (∃n:ℕ. 0 < a n))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  nat-star: ℕ*,  nat: ℕ,  less_than: a < b,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  not: ¬A,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  or: P ∨ Q,  apply: f a,  natural_number: $n,  int: ℤ,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  member: t ∈ T,  prop: ℙ,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  nat-star: ℕ*,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  nat: ℕ,  so_apply: x[s],  or: P ∨ Q,  cand: A c∧ B,  not: ¬A,  false: False,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  and: P ∧ Q,  le: A ≤ B,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  true: True,  guard: {T},  sq_type: SQType(T),  uimplies: b supposing a,  pi1: fst(t),  decidable: Dec(P),  squash: ↓T,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  nat-star-0: 0,  top: Top,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  ge: i ≥ j ,  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  int_seg: {i..j-},  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y]
Lemmas referenced :  all_wf,  nat-star_wf,  or_wf,  not_wf,  exists_wf,  nat_wf,  equal_wf,  equal-wf-base-T,  nat-star-retract_wf,  equal-wf-T-base,  equal-wf-base,  le_wf,  false_wf,  int_subtype_base,  subtype_base_sq,  strong-continuity2-implies-weak,  decidable__equal_int,  nat-star-0_wf,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  nat-star-retract-id,  subtype_rel_self,  iff_weakening_equal,  int_seg_subtype_nat,  int_seg_wf,  subtype_rel_dep_function,  quotient-implies-squash,  int_formula_prop_wf,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformeq_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformand_wf,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  nat_properties,  decidable__not,  decidable__exists_int_seg,  decidable__equal_nat,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  intformle_wf,  decidable__le,  int_seg_properties,  unit_wf2,  mu-dec-property,  it_wf,  less_than_wf,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  intformless_wf,  decidable__lt,  mu-dec_wf
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  lambdaFormation,  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  hypothesis,  sqequalRule,  lambdaEquality,  intEquality,  applyEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  hypothesisEquality,  because_Cache,  baseClosed,  functionEquality,  unionElimination,  functionExtensionality,  dependent_functionElimination,  productEquality,  voidElimination,  independent_functionElimination,  independent_pairFormation,  natural_numberEquality,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  dependent_pairFormation,  promote_hyp,  levelHypothesis,  equalitySymmetry,  equalityTransitivity,  independent_isectElimination,  cumulativity,  instantiate,  addLevel,  productElimination,  imageElimination,  universeEquality,  imageMemberEquality,  computeAll,  voidEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  int_eqEquality,  applyLambdaEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}a:\mBbbN{}*.  ((\mforall{}c:\mBbbN{}*.  ((\mneg{}\mneg{}(\mexists{}n:\mBbbN{}.  (\mneg{}((a  n)  =  (c  n)))))  \mvee{}  (\mneg{}\mneg{}(\mexists{}n:\mBbbN{}.  (\mneg{}(0  =  (c  n)))))))  {}\mRightarrow{}  (\mexists{}n:\mBbbN{}.  0  <  a  n))



Date html generated: 2018_05_21-PM-01_19_02
Last ObjectModification: 2018_05_15-PM-04_32_46

Theory : continuity


Home Index