Nuprl Lemma : div_is_zero

∀[n:{2...}]. ∀[i:ℤ].  i ÷ n ~ 0 supposing |i| < n


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  absval: |i|,  int_upper: {i...},  less_than: a < b,  uimplies: b supposing a,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  divide: n ÷ m,  natural_number: $n,  int: ℤ,  sqequal: s ~ t
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  uimplies: b supposing a,  sq_type: SQType(T),  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  guard: {T},  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  nat: ℕ,  int_upper: {i...},  int_nzero: ℤ-o,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T ,  not: ¬A,  false: False,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  top: Top,  and: P ∧ Q,  prop: ℙ,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  nat_plus: ℕ+,  squash: ↓T,  le: A ≤ B,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  true: True,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  int_lower: {...i},  gt: i > j,  ge: i ≥ j ,  cand: A c∧ B,  less_than: a < b,  uiff: uiff(P;Q)
Lemmas referenced :  subtype_base_sq,  int_subtype_base,  istype-less_than,  absval_wf,  istype-int,  istype-int_upper,  div_rem_sum,  subtype_rel_sets_simple,  le_wf,  nequal_wf,  full-omega-unsat,  intformand_wf,  intformeq_wf,  itermVar_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  intformle_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  istype-void,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  istype-le,  decidable__le,  rem_bounds_1,  int_upper_properties,  decidable__lt,  intformnot_wf,  intformless_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  nat_wf,  set_subtype_base,  absval-non-neg,  absval_pos,  equal_wf,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  istype-universe,  quotient-is-zero,  upper_subtype_nat,  istype-false,  subtype_rel_self,  iff_weakening_equal,  rem_bounds_2,  absval_neg,  itermMinus_wf,  int_term_value_minus_lemma,  mul_preserves_le,  itermMultiply_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  int_term_value_mul_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  decidable__equal_int,  add-is-int-iff,  multiply-is-int-iff,  false_wf
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  Error :isect_memberFormation_alt,  introduction,  cut,  thin,  instantiate,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  cumulativity,  intEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  hypothesis,  dependent_functionElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  independent_functionElimination,  axiomSqEquality,  hypothesisEquality,  applyEquality,  Error :lambdaEquality_alt,  setElimination,  rename,  Error :inhabitedIsType,  sqequalRule,  Error :isect_memberEquality_alt,  Error :isectIsTypeImplies,  natural_numberEquality,  Error :lambdaFormation_alt,  approximateComputation,  Error :dependent_pairFormation_alt,  int_eqEquality,  voidElimination,  independent_pairFormation,  Error :universeIsType,  Error :equalityIstype,  baseClosed,  sqequalBase,  because_Cache,  unionElimination,  Error :dependent_set_memberEquality_alt,  productElimination,  imageElimination,  universeEquality,  imageMemberEquality,  minusEquality,  divideEquality,  pointwiseFunctionality,  promote_hyp,  baseApply,  closedConclusion

Latex:
\mforall{}[n:\{2...\}].  \mforall{}[i:\mBbbZ{}].    i  \mdiv{}  n  \msim{}  0  supposing  |i|  <  n



Date html generated: 2019_06_20-PM-01_18_50
Last ObjectModification: 2019_02_12-PM-00_26_19

Theory : int_2


Home Index