Nuprl Lemma : fshift_increasing

∀[n:ℕ]. ∀[x:ℤ]. ∀[f:ℕn ⟶ ℤ].  (increasing(fshift(f;x);n + 1)) supposing (x < f 0 and 0 < n and increasing(f;n))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  fshift: fshift(f;x),  increasing: increasing(f;k),  int_seg: {i..j-},  nat: ℕ,  less_than: a < b,  uimplies: b supposing a,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  apply: f a,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  add: n + m,  natural_number: $n,  int: ℤ
Definitions unfolded in proof :  fshift: fshift(f;x),  increasing: increasing(f;k),  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  uimplies: b supposing a,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  int_seg: {i..j-},  implies: P ⇒ Q,  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  and: P ∧ Q,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  guard: {T},  nat: ℕ,  ge: i ≥ j ,  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  false: False,  not: ¬A,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  top: Top,  prop: ℙ,  bfalse: ff,  or: P ∨ Q,  sq_type: SQType(T),  bnot: ¬bb,  assert: ↑b,  squash: ↓T,  label: ...$L... t,  decidable: Dec(P),  true: True,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T ,  le: A ≤ B,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  subtract: n - m,  so_apply: x[s]
Lemmas referenced :  eq_int_wf,  bool_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_eq_int,  add-subtract-cancel,  int_seg_properties,  nat_properties,  full-omega-unsat,  intformand_wf,  intformeq_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  itermVar_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  eqff_to_assert,  equal_wf,  bool_cases_sqequal,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  neg_assert_of_eq_int,  less_than_wf,  decidable__equal_int,  intformnot_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  decidable__le,  intformle_wf,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  decidable__lt,  intformless_wf,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  lelt_wf,  iff_weakening_equal,  general_arith_equation1,  int_seg_wf,  subtract_wf,  member-less_than,  itermSubtract_wf,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  false_wf,  all_wf,  add-member-int_seg2,  nat_wf
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalRule,  sqequalReflexivity,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  isect_memberFormation,  introduction,  cut,  lambdaFormation,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  setElimination,  rename,  hypothesisEquality,  hypothesis,  natural_numberEquality,  unionElimination,  equalityElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  productElimination,  independent_isectElimination,  because_Cache,  addEquality,  approximateComputation,  independent_functionElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  lambdaEquality,  int_eqEquality,  intEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  promote_hyp,  instantiate,  applyEquality,  imageElimination,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  cumulativity,  functionExtensionality,  functionEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}[n:\mBbbN{}].  \mforall{}[x:\mBbbZ{}].  \mforall{}[f:\mBbbN{}n  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbZ{}].
    (increasing(fshift(f;x);n  +  1))  supposing  (x  <  f  0  and  0  <  n  and  increasing(f;n))



Date html generated: 2018_05_21-PM-01_00_11
Last ObjectModification: 2018_05_19-AM-06_38_45

Theory : num_thy_1


Home Index