Nuprl Lemma : implies-qle

∀[a,b:ℚ].  a ≤ b supposing ∀n:ℕ+. (a ≤ (b + (1/n)))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  qle: r ≤ s,  qdiv: (r/s),  qadd: r + s,  rationals: ℚ,  nat_plus: ℕ+,  uimplies: b supposing a,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  natural_number: $n
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  uimplies: b supposing a,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  and: P ∧ Q,  not: ¬A,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  prop: ℙ,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  nat_plus: ℕ+,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  false: False,  top: Top,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  true: True,  guard: {T},  qsub: r - s,  squash: ↓T,  rev_uimplies: rev_uimplies(P;Q),  nat: ℕ,  ge: i ≥ j ,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q
Lemmas referenced :  qless_complement_qorder,  qless_wf,  qle_witness,  nat_plus_wf,  qle_wf,  qadd_wf,  qdiv_wf,  subtype_rel_set,  rationals_wf,  less_than_wf,  istype-int,  int-subtype-rationals,  nat_plus_properties,  full-omega-unsat,  intformand_wf,  intformeq_wf,  itermVar_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  intformless_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  istype-void,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  set_subtype_base,  int_subtype_base,  iff_weakening_uiff,  equal-wf-base,  int-equal-in-rationals,  qsub_wf,  qmul_wf,  uiff_transitivity2,  qadd_preserves_qless,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  qmul_over_plus_qrng,  qmul_zero_qrng,  qinv_inv_q,  mon_assoc_q,  qadd_comm_q,  qadd_ac_1_q,  qinverse_q,  mon_ident_q,  qless_transitivity_2_qorder,  qle_weakening_eq_qorder,  qless_irreflexivity,  q-archimedean,  qless-int,  nat_properties,  decidable__lt,  intformnot_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  intformle_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  le_wf,  qadd-add,  istype-less_than,  qmul_preserves_qle,  qmul-qdiv-cancel,  subtype_rel_self,  iff_weakening_equal,  qmul_one_qrng,  qmul_comm_qrng,  qmul_over_minus_qrng,  qadd_preserves_qle,  qadd_inv_assoc_q
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation_alt,  introduction,  cut,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  hypothesisEquality,  productElimination,  independent_isectElimination,  lambdaFormation_alt,  universeIsType,  hypothesis,  independent_functionElimination,  sqequalRule,  functionIsType,  natural_numberEquality,  applyEquality,  because_Cache,  intEquality,  lambdaEquality_alt,  setElimination,  rename,  approximateComputation,  dependent_pairFormation_alt,  int_eqEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  isect_memberEquality_alt,  voidElimination,  independent_pairFormation,  equalityIstype,  baseClosed,  sqequalBase,  equalitySymmetry,  inhabitedIsType,  isectIsTypeImplies,  minusEquality,  imageElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  imageMemberEquality,  addEquality,  unionElimination,  baseApply,  closedConclusion,  dependent_set_memberEquality_alt,  instantiate,  universeEquality,  hyp_replacement,  applyLambdaEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}[a,b:\mBbbQ{}].    a  \mleq{}  b  supposing  \mforall{}n:\mBbbN{}\msupplus{}.  (a  \mleq{}  (b  +  (1/n)))



Date html generated: 2019_10_16-PM-00_37_03
Last ObjectModification: 2019_06_26-PM-05_06_49

Theory : rationals


Home Index