Nuprl Lemma : lifting-decide-decide
∀[a,F,G,A,B:Top].
(case case a of inl(x) => F[x] | inr(x) => G[x] of inl(x) => A[x] | inr(x) => B[x] ~ case a
of inl(x) =>
case F[x] of inl(y) => A[y] | inr(y) => B[y]
| inr(x) =>
case G[x] of inl(y) => A[y] | inr(y) => B[y])
Proof
Definitions occuring in Statement :
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],
top: Top,
so_apply: x[s],
decide: case b of inl(x) => s[x] | inr(y) => t[y],
sqequal: s ~ t
Definitions unfolded in proof :
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],
member: t ∈ T,
so_lambda: so_lambda(x,y,z,w.t[x; y; z; w]),
so_apply: x[s1;s2;s3;s4],
so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],
top: Top,
so_apply: x[s],
uimplies: b supposing a,
strict4: strict4(F),
and: P ∧ Q,
all: ∀x:A. B[x],
implies: P ⇒ Q,
has-value: (a)↓,
prop: ℙ,
guard: {T},
or: P ∨ Q,
squash: ↓T
Lemmas referenced :
lifting-strict-decide,
top_wf,
equal_wf,
has-value_wf_base,
base_wf,
is-exception_wf
Rules used in proof :
sqequalSubstitution,
sqequalTransitivity,
computationStep,
sqequalReflexivity,
isect_memberFormation,
introduction,
cut,
sqequalRule,
extract_by_obid,
sqequalHypSubstitution,
isectElimination,
thin,
baseClosed,
isect_memberEquality,
voidElimination,
voidEquality,
independent_isectElimination,
independent_pairFormation,
lambdaFormation,
callbyvalueDecide,
hypothesis,
hypothesisEquality,
equalityTransitivity,
equalitySymmetry,
unionEquality,
unionElimination,
sqleReflexivity,
dependent_functionElimination,
independent_functionElimination,
baseApply,
closedConclusion,
decideExceptionCases,
inrFormation,
because_Cache,
imageMemberEquality,
imageElimination,
exceptionSqequal,
inlFormation,
sqequalAxiom
Latex:
\mforall{}[a,F,G,A,B:Top].
(case case a of inl(x) => F[x] | inr(x) => G[x] of inl(x) => A[x] | inr(x) => B[x] \msim{} case a
of inl(x) =>
case F[x] of inl(y) => A[y] | inr(y) => B[y]
| inr(x) =>
case G[x] of inl(y) => A[y] | inr(y) => B[y])
Date html generated:
2017_04_14-AM-07_21_08
Last ObjectModification:
2017_02_27-PM-02_54_35
Theory : computation
Home
Index