Nuprl Lemma : fpf-join-list-ap2

[A:Type]
  ∀eq:EqDecider(A)
    ∀[B:A ⟶ Type]
      ∀L:a:A fp-> B[a] List. ∀x:A.  ((x ∈ fpf-domain(⊕(L)))  (∃f∈L. (↑x ∈ dom(f)) ∧ (⊕(L)(x) f(x) ∈ B[x])))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  fpf-join-list: (L) fpf-ap: f(x) fpf-domain: fpf-domain(f) fpf-dom: x ∈ dom(f) fpf: a:A fp-> B[a] l_exists: (∃x∈L. P[x]) l_member: (x ∈ l) list: List deq: EqDecider(T) assert: b uall: [x:A]. B[x] so_apply: x[s] all: x:A. B[x] implies:  Q and: P ∧ Q function: x:A ⟶ B[x] universe: Type equal: t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: [x:A]. B[x] member: t ∈ T all: x:A. B[x] so_lambda: λ2x.t[x] so_apply: x[s] implies:  Q uimplies: supposing a subtype_rel: A ⊆B top: Top prop: iff: ⇐⇒ Q and: P ∧ Q rev_implies:  Q
Lemmas referenced :  fpf-join-list-ap list_wf fpf_wf deq_wf l_member_wf fpf-domain_wf fpf-join-list_wf top_wf subtype_rel_list subtype-fpf2 member-fpf-domain
Rules used in proof :  cut lemma_by_obid sqequalSubstitution sqequalTransitivity computationStep sqequalReflexivity isect_memberFormation hypothesis sqequalHypSubstitution isectElimination thin hypothesisEquality lambdaFormation dependent_functionElimination sqequalRule lambdaEquality applyEquality functionEquality cumulativity universeEquality independent_isectElimination because_Cache isect_memberEquality voidElimination voidEquality productElimination independent_functionElimination

Latex:
\mforall{}[A:Type]
    \mforall{}eq:EqDecider(A)
        \mforall{}[B:A  {}\mrightarrow{}  Type]
            \mforall{}L:a:A  fp->  B[a]  List.  \mforall{}x:A.
                ((x  \mmember{}  fpf-domain(\moplus{}(L)))  {}\mRightarrow{}  (\mexists{}f\mmember{}L.  (\muparrow{}x  \mmember{}  dom(f))  \mwedge{}  (\moplus{}(L)(x)  =  f(x))))



Date html generated: 2018_05_21-PM-09_22_59
Last ObjectModification: 2018_02_09-AM-10_19_02

Theory : finite!partial!functions


Home Index