Nuprl Lemma : canon-bnd_wf

∀[x:ℝ]. (canon-bnd(x) ∈ {k:{3...}| ∀n:ℕ+. (|x n| ≤ (n * k))} )


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  canon-bnd: canon-bnd(x),  real: ℝ,  absval: |i|,  int_upper: {i...},  nat_plus: ℕ+,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  le: A ≤ B,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  set: {x:A| B[x]} ,  apply: f a,  multiply: n * m,  natural_number: $n
Definitions unfolded in proof :  and: P ∧ Q,  ge: i ≥ j ,  guard: {T},  nat: ℕ,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  false: False,  prop: ℙ,  top: Top,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  implies: P ⇒ Q,  not: ¬A,  uimplies: b supposing a,  or: P ∨ Q,  decidable: Dec(P),  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  nat_plus: ℕ+,  int_upper: {i...},  canon-bnd: canon-bnd(x),  real: ℝ,  member: t ∈ T,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  regular-int-seq: k-regular-seq(f),  subtract: n - m,  sq_type: SQType(T),  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  squash: ↓T,  rev_uimplies: rev_uimplies(P;Q),  so_apply: x[s],  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  true: True
Lemmas referenced :  real_wf,  nat_plus_wf,  istype-le,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  itermAdd_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformle_wf,  intformand_wf,  nat_properties,  decidable__le,  istype-less_than,  int_formula_prop_wf,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  istype-void,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  istype-int,  itermConstant_wf,  intformless_wf,  intformnot_wf,  full-omega-unsat,  decidable__lt,  absval_wf,  nat_plus_properties,  add-zero,  zero-mul,  add-mul-special,  add-swap,  add-commutes,  one-mul,  mul-commutes,  minus-one-mul,  mul-distributes,  subtract_wf,  int-triangle-inequality,  int_subtype_base,  subtype_base_sq,  decidable__equal_int,  int_term_value_mul_lemma,  itermMultiply_wf,  iff_weakening_equal,  subtype_rel_self,  absval_mul,  add_functionality_wrt_eq,  true_wf,  squash_wf,  add_functionality_wrt_le,  le_weakening,  le_functionality,  nat_plus_subtype_nat,  absval_pos,  absval-non-neg,  le_wf,  set_subtype_base,  nat_wf,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  intformeq_wf
Rules used in proof :  axiomEquality,  multiplyEquality,  functionIsType,  lambdaFormation_alt,  independent_pairFormation,  int_eqEquality,  applyLambdaEquality,  equalitySymmetry,  equalityTransitivity,  because_Cache,  universeIsType,  sqequalRule,  voidElimination,  isect_memberEquality_alt,  lambdaEquality_alt,  dependent_pairFormation_alt,  independent_functionElimination,  approximateComputation,  independent_isectElimination,  unionElimination,  hypothesis,  dependent_functionElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  hypothesisEquality,  applyEquality,  isectElimination,  extract_by_obid,  addEquality,  dependent_set_memberEquality_alt,  rename,  thin,  setElimination,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  cut,  introduction,  isect_memberFormation_alt,  sqequalReflexivity,  computationStep,  sqequalTransitivity,  sqequalSubstitution,  inhabitedIsType,  minusEquality,  intEquality,  cumulativity,  instantiate,  productElimination,  universeEquality,  baseClosed,  imageMemberEquality,  imageElimination

Latex:
\mforall{}[x:\mBbbR{}].  (canon-bnd(x)  \mmember{}  \{k:\{3...\}|  \mforall{}n:\mBbbN{}\msupplus{}.  (|x  n|  \mleq{}  (n  *  k))\}  )



Date html generated: 2019_10_16-PM-03_06_37
Last ObjectModification: 2019_10_10-PM-03_16_17

Theory : reals


Home Index