Nuprl Lemma : assert-bdd-all

∀n:ℕ. ∀P:ℕn ⟶ 𝔹.  (↑bdd-all(n;i.P[i]) ⇐⇒ ∀i:ℕn. (↑P[i]))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  bdd-all: bdd-all(n;i.P[i]),  int_seg: {i..j-},  nat: ℕ,  assert: ↑b,  bool: 𝔹,  so_apply: x[s],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  natural_number: $n
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  nat: ℕ,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  false: False,  ge: i ≥ j ,  guard: {T},  uimplies: b supposing a,  prop: ℙ,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  and: P ∧ Q,  so_apply: x[s],  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  bdd-all: bdd-all(n;i.P[i]),  top: Top,  assert: ↑b,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  btrue: tt,  int_seg: {i..j-},  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  true: True,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  le: A ≤ B,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  not: ¬A,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  subtract: n - m,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  istype: istype(T),  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  band: p ∧b q,  bfalse: ff,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  sq_type: SQType(T),  bnot: ¬bb,  label: ...$L... t,  rev_uimplies: rev_uimplies(P;Q)
Lemmas referenced :  nat_properties,  less_than_transitivity1,  less_than_irreflexivity,  ge_wf,  less_than_wf,  assert_witness,  bdd-all_wf,  int_seg_wf,  primrec0_lemma,  istype-void,  true_wf,  assert_wf,  bool_wf,  le_wf,  subtract-1-ge-0,  subtype_rel_dep_function,  subtract_wf,  subtype_rel_sets,  and_wf,  decidable__lt,  istype-false,  not-lt-2,  less-iff-le,  condition-implies-le,  add-associates,  istype-int,  minus-add,  minus-one-mul,  add-swap,  minus-one-mul-top,  add-commutes,  add_functionality_wrt_le,  le-add-cancel2,  primrec-unroll,  nat_wf,  lt_int_wf,  equal-wf-base,  int_subtype_base,  add-zero,  btrue_wf,  le_int_wf,  bnot_wf,  iff_weakening_uiff,  decidable__le,  not-le-2,  zero-add,  minus-minus,  le-add-cancel,  add-mul-special,  zero-mul,  le-add-cancel-alt,  eqtt_to_assert,  eqff_to_assert,  bool_cases_sqequal,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  assert_of_band,  uiff_transitivity,  assert_of_lt_int,  assert_functionality_wrt_uiff,  bnot_of_lt_int,  assert_of_le_int,  decidable__int_equal,  le_antisymmetry_iff,  not-equal-2
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  Error :lambdaFormation_alt,  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  hypothesisEquality,  hypothesis,  setElimination,  rename,  intWeakElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  independent_functionElimination,  voidElimination,  Error :universeIsType,  sqequalRule,  Error :lambdaEquality_alt,  dependent_functionElimination,  productElimination,  independent_pairEquality,  applyEquality,  Error :functionIsTypeImplies,  Error :inhabitedIsType,  Error :isect_memberEquality_alt,  independent_pairFormation,  Error :functionIsType,  Error :dependent_set_memberEquality_alt,  because_Cache,  intEquality,  Error :setIsType,  Error :productIsType,  unionElimination,  addEquality,  minusEquality,  baseApply,  closedConclusion,  baseClosed,  promote_hyp,  equalityElimination,  Error :dependent_pairFormation_alt,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  Error :equalityIsType1,  instantiate,  productEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}n:\mBbbN{}.  \mforall{}P:\mBbbN{}n  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbB{}.    (\muparrow{}bdd-all(n;i.P[i])  \mLeftarrow{}{}\mRightarrow{}  \mforall{}i:\mBbbN{}n.  (\muparrow{}P[i]))



Date html generated: 2019_06_20-AM-11_32_42
Last ObjectModification: 2018_10_06-AM-09_00_33

Theory : bool_1


Home Index