Nuprl Lemma : W-path-lemma

∀A:Type. ∀B:A ⟶ Type. ∀x:W(A;a.B[a]). ∀alpha:ℕ ⟶ cw-step(A;a.B[a]).
  ((∀n:ℕ. (W-rel(A;a.B[a];x) n alpha (alpha n))) ⇒ (alpha ∈ Path))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  W-rel: W-rel(A;a.B[a];w),  W: W(A;a.B[a]),  cw-step: cw-step(A;a.B[a]),  pcw-path: Path,  nat: ℕ,  it: ⋅,  so_apply: x[s],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  unit: Unit,  member: t ∈ T,  apply: f a,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  universe: Type
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  member: t ∈ T,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  nat: ℕ,  uimplies: b supposing a,  le: A ≤ B,  and: P ∧ Q,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  false: False,  not: ¬A,  pcw-path: Path,  cw-step: cw-step(A;a.B[a]),  so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  so_lambda: so_lambda(x,y,z.t[x; y; z]),  so_apply: x[s1;s2;s3],  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  sq_stable: SqStable(P),  squash: ↓T,  subtract: n - m,  top: Top,  true: True,  prop: ℙ,  W-rel: W-rel(A;a.B[a];w),  param-W-rel: param-W-rel(P;p.A[p];p,a.B[p; a];p,a,b.C[p; a; b];par;w),  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  less_than: a < b,  pcw-step: pcw-step(P;p.A[p];p,a.B[p; a];p,a,b.C[p; a; b]),  pi2: snd(t),  isl: isl(x),  guard: {T},  bfalse: ff,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  sq_type: SQType(T),  bnot: ¬bb,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  assert: ↑b,  W: W(A;a.B[a])
Lemmas referenced :  nat_wf,  W-rel_wf,  istype-universe,  subtype_rel_function,  cw-step_wf,  int_seg_wf,  int_seg_subtype_nat,  istype-void,  subtype_rel_self,  W_wf,  pcw-step_wf,  unit_wf2,  it_wf,  decidable__le,  istype-false,  not-le-2,  sq_stable__le,  condition-implies-le,  minus-add,  istype-int,  minus-one-mul,  zero-add,  minus-one-mul-top,  add-associates,  add-swap,  add-commutes,  add_functionality_wrt_le,  add-zero,  le-add-cancel,  le_wf,  add-subtract-cancel,  lt_int_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_lt_int,  istype-top,  assert_wf,  btrue_wf,  bfalse_wf,  pcw-steprel_wf,  le_weakening2,  eqff_to_assert,  bool_cases_sqequal,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_wf,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  iff_weakening_uiff,  less_than_wf,  not-lt-2,  pcw-step-agree_wf,  subtype_rel-equal,  param-W_wf,  param-co-W_wf,  top_wf
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  Error :lambdaFormation_alt,  cut,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  hypothesis,  sqequalRule,  Error :functionIsType,  Error :universeIsType,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  applyEquality,  isectElimination,  thin,  hypothesisEquality,  Error :lambdaEquality_alt,  natural_numberEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  because_Cache,  independent_isectElimination,  independent_pairFormation,  Error :inhabitedIsType,  universeEquality,  Error :dependent_set_memberEquality_alt,  functionExtensionality,  dependent_functionElimination,  addEquality,  unionElimination,  voidElimination,  productElimination,  independent_functionElimination,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  imageElimination,  Error :isect_memberEquality_alt,  minusEquality,  equalityElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  lessCases,  Error :isect_memberFormation_alt,  axiomSqEquality,  Error :productIsType,  Error :equalityIsType1,  Error :dependent_pairFormation_alt,  promote_hyp,  instantiate,  cumulativity

Latex:
\mforall{}A:Type.  \mforall{}B:A  {}\mrightarrow{}  Type.  \mforall{}x:W(A;a.B[a]).  \mforall{}alpha:\mBbbN{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  cw-step(A;a.B[a]).
    ((\mforall{}n:\mBbbN{}.  (W-rel(A;a.B[a];x)  n  alpha  (alpha  n)))  {}\mRightarrow{}  (alpha  \mmember{}  Path))



Date html generated: 2019_06_20-PM-00_36_24
Last ObjectModification: 2018_10_06-AM-11_20_32

Theory : co-recursion


Home Index